Angular momentum of a thin spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
A thin spherical shell of radius 0.50 m and mass 15 kg rotating about its center has an angular momentum calculated using the moment of inertia formula L = Iω. The moment of inertia for a thin spherical shell is (2/3)mr², leading to an angular momentum of 12.5 kg m²/s when using the correct parameters. Confusion arose when applying the point mass formula L = r x mv, which is inappropriate for a spherical shell due to its mass distribution. The discussion clarified that while a hollow cylinder has all its mass at a distance R from the axis, a spherical shell does not, as points on its surface are at varying distances from the axis of rotation. Ultimately, the correct angular momentum for the shell is 12.5 kg m²/s, not 18.75 or 19 as previously suggested.
slr77
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
A thin spherical shell of radius R = 0.50 m and mass 15 kg rotates about the z-axis through its center and parallel to its axis. When the angular velocity is 5.0 rad/s, its angular momentum (in kg ⋅ m2/s) is approximately:

a . 15
b. 9.0
c. 12
d. 19
e. 25

Homework Equations


[/B]
L = r x mv
L = Iω
v = rω
Moment of inertia of thin spherical shell = (2/3)mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I seem to be getting different answer using the equations above and I can't figure out why.

v = 0.5 * 5 = 2.5
L = (0.5)(15)(2.5) = 18.75

and

L = (5)(2/3)(15)(0.5)^2 = 12.5

The answer is the first one (18.75) but where did I go wrong with the using L = Iω?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi slr77,

You didn't go wrong using the correct formula for the moment of inertia of a thin spherical shell. The correct answer to the problem is 12.5 kg m2 s-1.

L = r x mv applies to a point mass. The shell is not a point mass, and can't be treated as such as most of it is distributed at distances other than r from the axis of rotation.
 
Hey gneill,

The solution listed d (19) as the correct answer so I guess it's mistaken.

This has uncovered some confusion about this topic though. I thought a thin-walled spherical shell had all it's mass distributed a distance r from the center. A thin-walled how cylinder has I = MR^2 (which means that all it's mass distributed at a distance r from the axis of rotation, right? I could use r x mv in that case because then Iω = rmv). How does a spherical shell differ from this? Or am I thinking of thin-walled how cylinders incorrectly too?

edit: Ok, I think I understand. The axis of rotation of the sphere passes through the middle so there are points on the wall of the sphere that are less than r away from the axis of rotation. In the cases of the hollow cylinder, every point on the wall is r away from the axis of rotation
 
Last edited:
slr77 said:
Hey gneill,

The solution listed d (19) as the correct answer so I guess it's mistaken.

This has uncovered some confusion about this topic though. I thought a thin-walled spherical shell had all it's mass distributed a distance r from the center.
Correct. But the center is not an axis of rotation. The axis may pass through the center.
A thin-walled how cylinder has I = MR^2 (which means that all it's mass distributed at a distance r from the axis of rotation, right?
Right. All the mass is located at distance R from the axis of rotation.
I could use r x mv in that case because then Iω = rmv). How does a spherical shell differ from this? Or am I thinking of thin-walled how cylinders incorrectly too?
No, cylinder good, shell bad :smile:

Sketch the profile of a cylindrical shell and its axis of rotation. Draw perpendiculars from the axis to the shell. Are they all the same length? How about the case of a spherical shell?
 
slr77 said:
L = (5)(2/3)(15)(0.5)^2 = 12.5

The answer is the first one (18.75) but where did I go wrong with the using L = Iω?
Your answer is correct, theirs isn't.
A spherical shell and a right circular cylinder are fundamentally different geometries. Don't try to extrapolate from one to the other.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top