Angular momentum of particle about the origin

AI Thread Summary
A particle with a mass of 5 kg moves at a constant velocity of 2 m/s along the line defined by 2y=3x+4, and the discussion focuses on calculating its angular momentum about the origin. The relevant equation for angular momentum, L, is given as L = r x p, where r is the position vector and p is the momentum. A participant initially misunderstands the relationship between the position vector and the momentum, believing that the perpendicular component of the position vector increases over time, but later clarifies their confusion with the help of a diagram. The conversation also touches on the appreciation for community support in learning, with a participant expressing interest in donating to the forum. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding vector components in angular momentum calculations.
Krushnaraj Pandya
Gold Member
Messages
697
Reaction score
73

Homework Statement


A particle (5 kg) moves with constant velocity 2 m/s along the straight line 2y=3x+4, the angular momentum of the particle about origin is?

Homework Equations


L=r x p

The Attempt at a Solution


For a 2d problem we take the component of velocity perpendicular to the point about which we want to find the momentum and multiply it with the perpendicular distance. Here slope of the line gives tanθ=3/2, p=mv=10 and L=mvrcosθ, mvcosθ equals 20/√13 but isn't the distance r (here r=the y coordinate of the particle) continuously increasing? I get the correct answer for r=2 though, I don't understand how. I'd really appreciate some help, thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\vec r \times \vec p## only depends on the part of ##\vec r## that is orthogonal to ##\vec p##.
 
Orodruin said:
##\vec r \times \vec p## only depends on the part of ##\vec r## that is orthogonal to ##\vec p##.
I know only the very basics of vectors, (its yet to be reached in our mathematics coursework). I suppose the part of r that's perpendicular to momentum is what you mean but that part seems to be increasing with time as well
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
but that part seems to be increasing with time as well
Why do you think so? (It is not correct)
 
upload_2018-10-23_16-12-40.jpeg

Here is a quick drawing of the situation.
The red vector is always the part of the position vector orthogonal to p. The blue vectors are different position vectors for the part let moving along the black line and the magenta vector its momentum. The green vectors are the components of the position vectors not perpendicular to p.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-23_16-12-40.jpeg
    upload_2018-10-23_16-12-40.jpeg
    19.5 KB · Views: 712
Orodruin said:
View attachment 232643
Here is a quick drawing of the situation.
The red vector is always the part of the position vector orthogonal to p. The blue vectors are different position vectors for the part let moving along the black line and the magenta vector its momentum. The green vectors are the components of the position vectors not perpendicular to p.
Ohh, I understand really well where I was thinking wrong. The diagram helped a lot. Thank you :D
The fact that people on this website take out so much time to help students like me amazes me, so I've thought about donating to the site from my savings after my exams this year are over. can you direct me to where I can do that?
 
Krushnaraj Pandya said:
The fact that people on this website take out so much time to help students like me amazes me, so I've thought about donating to the site from my savings after my exams this year are over. can you direct me to where I can do that?
If you want to support PF I would suggest a gold membership. It supports PF and you get something out of it. See also
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/easy-ways-you-can-support-physics-forums.813856/
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Back
Top