How Do You Approach Angular Momentum Operator Algebra in Quantum Mechanics?

gfd43tg
Gold Member
Messages
947
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2015-4-12_18-18-23.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


This whole thing about angular momentum has me totally confused and stumped, but I am trying this problem given in a youtube video lecture I watched.

I know of this equation
##L^{2} = L_{\pm}L_{\mp} + L_{z}^{2} \mp \hbar L_{z}##
##L^{2}f = \lambda f##
##L_{z}f = \mu f##

In the case ##L^{2}f = 2 \hbar^{2}f##, the eigenvalue ##\lambda = 2 \hbar^{2}##

So I expand
$$L^{2}f = (L_{-}L_{+} + L_{z}^{2} + \hbar L_{z})f$$
But, I don't know what ##L_{z}## should be. Also, how do I know if I should pick ##L_{-}L_{+}## or ##L_{+}L_{-}##?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-4-11_20-10-8.png
    upload_2015-4-11_20-10-8.png
    18 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a little puzzled by the examples, because normally L^2 has eigenvalues \hbar^2 l(l+1), where l is a nonnegative integer. For your second example, l would have to be fractional. It's possible for the total angular momentum (which includes both spin angular momentum and orbital angular momentum) to be fractional, but usually L refers to orbital angular momentum.

But in any case, it's overkill to consider raising and lowering operators. The fact that's relevant is that if L^2 has the value \hbar^2 l(l+1), then L_z can take on any of the following values:
  • l
  • l-1
  • l-2
  • ...
  • -l
 
  • Like
Likes gfd43tg
Hi stevedaryl,

sorry for my late response. I was able to go to my prof's office and get some help on this. Using your post alone, I was not equipped with the necessary understanding to answer this question. I needed to understand the sphere with cones inside to get some intuition for what ##l## and ##m## mean. After rereading your response, it makes sense what you were saying, I just needed to know about ##m##
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?

Similar threads

Back
Top