Angular momentum or work-energy balance?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the angular velocity \(\omega_{2}\) of an apparatus after its rods are released from an initial angular velocity \(\omega_{1}\). Two methods are debated: a work-energy balance approach, which simplifies to \(0.5 I_{1}\omega_{1}^{2} = 0.5 I_{2}\omega_{2}^{2}\), and conservation of angular momentum, expressed as \(I_{1}\omega_{1} = I_{2}\omega_{2}\). The conservation of angular momentum is favored since there are no external torques acting on the system, ensuring total angular momentum is conserved. Additionally, the energy conservation analysis reveals that the final kinetic energy about the vertical axis is less than the initial kinetic energy, indicating some energy is transferred to the rotation about the horizontal pins. Ultimately, using angular momentum conservation provides a more straightforward solution for finding \(\omega_{2}\).
cambo86
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

The apparatus above has an initial angular velocity of \omega_{1} as the rods are released. I need to find the angular velocity \omega_{2} of the apparatus at the bottom.

I've tried 3 methods.
First I tried a work-energy balance where I included a gravitational potential energy.
KE_{1} + PE = KE_{2}
0.5 I_{1}\omega_{1}^{2} + mgh = 0.5 I_{2}\omega_{2}^{2}

Then I figured that the potential energy is going to only contribute to an increase in velocity of the arms falling down so I dropped the PE term and got,
0.5 I_{1}\omega_{1}^{2} = 0.5 I_{2}\omega_{2}^{2}

I'm just wondering which is correct?

Then I spoke to another student in the class and he said he used conservation of angular momentum. So, he got,
I_{1}\omega_{1} = I_{2}\omega_{2}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The angular momentum I have to solve for is indicated by N in the picture.
 
Hello.

There are no external torques acting on the apparatus. So, total angular momentum about the vertical rotation axis will be conserved. So, ##I_1\omega_1 = I_2\omega_2## will get the answer.

Energy conservation is interesting here. If you assume no dissipation of mechanical energy due to friction in the horizontal pins through the ends of the rods, then total mechanical energy will be conserved. When the rods reach the horizontal position, they will be rotating about the pins as well as rotating about the vertical axis. So, you would have to write the equation of conservation of energy as $$KE_1 + PE = KE_2 + KE'$$ where ##KE_1## and ##KE_2## are the initial and final KE's associated with rotation about the vertical axis and ##KE'## is the kinetic energy associated with the rotation of the rods about the pins in the ends of the rods at the instant the rods are horizontal. Both ##KE_2## and ##KE'## are unknowns, so the energy equation alone does not allow you to get the answer.

Although you might expect ##KE'## to equal ##PE##, it turns out that ##KE'## is greater than ##PE##. So, when the arms reach the horizontal position, they have more KE of rotation about the horizontal pins than the amount of initial PE. Thus, it must be that some of the initial ##KE_1## about the vertical axis is transferred to ##KE'##. This in turn means that ##KE_2 < KE_1##; i.e., the final KE about the vertical axis is less than the initial KE about the vertical axis.

You can verify this by first using conservation of angular momentum to get ##\omega_2## and then calculating ##KE_2## to see that ##KE_2 < KE_1##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top