What's the relationship between T = r X F and T = I(alpha)?

AI Thread Summary
T = r X F defines torque, while T = I(alpha) represents Newton's second law for rotational motion. Both equations describe the same physical concept, linking torque to rotational dynamics. They can be equated to solve for specific variables in physics problems. Understanding this relationship clarifies their application in mechanics. The discussion emphasizes the simplicity of these foundational principles in physics.
mrbill
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
What's the difference between T = r X F and T = I(alpha)? My book really sucks it up with the explanations. Both make sense to me. The answer is right in front of me I am sure, but I am just not catching it. One is merely an expression of Newton's second law? Bah, it can't be that simple!

MrBill.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by mrbill
Bah, it can't be that simple!
That's pretty much it. T = r X F is the definition of torque; T = I*α is Newton's 2nd law for rotational motion.
 
There is no difference, they're just 2 formulas relating to the same; that's why the two formulas can be set equal to each other in order to solve for a certain variable.
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

Angular Momentum- Conserved or not?
Replies
17
Views
413
Alpha Particle Scattering and angular momentum
Replies
4
Views
2K
Kepler's Third Law vs Conservation of angular momentum
Replies
8
Views
2K
Angular momentum conservation on a merry-go-round
Replies
5
Views
2K
Show the relationship between torque and angular momentum
Replies
3
Views
1K
Using the angular momentum principle for 2 pucks
Replies
3
Views
2K
Is the Angular Momentum of a Pendulum Conserved?
Replies
5
Views
6K
Why did I get this angular momentum problem wrong?
Replies
25
Views
11K
Equivalence of Euler-Lagrange equations and Cardinal Equations for a rigid planar system
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Does Conservation of Angular Momentum Apply in a Torque-Free System?
Replies
12
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top