Angular Speed of Rotating Disk: Omega Final & Initial

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the final angular speed of a rotating disk when it transitions to pure rolling after being placed on a surface. Key equations include the conservation of energy and the relationship between linear and angular velocities during rolling without slipping. Participants suggest using Newton's laws for both translational and rotational motion to analyze the forces and torques acting on the disk. There is confusion regarding how to relate the forces of friction to the disk's rotational dynamics, with suggestions to derive equations for angular acceleration and linear acceleration over time. The goal is to find the conditions under which the disk rolls without slipping, ultimately leading to a solution for the final angular speed.
mburt3
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform disk is set into rotation with an initial angular speed about its axis through its center. While still rotating at this speed, the disk is placed in contact with a horizontal surface and released. What is the angular speed of the disk once pure rolling takes place (in terms of omega final and initial)?


Homework Equations


1/2mv(int)^2 + 1/2Iw(int)^2 = 1/2mv(final)^2 + 1/2Iw(final)^2
Torque=d(L)/d(t)
Normal Force=mg
I=1/2mr^2
L=Iw

The Attempt at a Solution


I knew that the only once a disk rolls without slipping does w=v/r
I simplified the first equation as follows:
v(int)^2 + 1/2r^2w(int)^2 = v(final)^2 + 1/2v(final)^2
v(int)^2 + 1/2r^2w(int)^2 = 3/2v(final)^2

I also knew that the only force acting on the disk was the surface. So I knew that
Fr= d(L)/d(t)
mgr=[w(final)I-w(int)I]/d(t)
from there I got that
g=[r(w(final)-w(int))]/2d(t)

I really have no idea where to go from here though. Any push in the right direction would be appreciated!
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only horizontal force acting on the disk is friction from the surface. That force does two things: (1) It accelerates the center of mass, (2) It creates a torque that slows down the initial rotation.

At some point the translational speed will be just enough compared to the rotational speed so that the condition for rolling without slipping will be met. Solve for that point.
 
So do I use those equations...or is it a lot easier than I am thinking? I was thinking you could do something with work being equal to final ke - initial ke and also that
torque x change in time= change in angular momentum.
I guess I am still really lost.
 
I suggest that you use Newton's 2nd law for translation and rotation, and a bit of kinematics: Δv = at; Δω = αt.
 
Thank you for your help so far by the way!
I set up an equation for the rotation, but I'm still a little confused on the rotation.

I(alpha)=F(friction)r
(1/2mr^2)a/R=F(frict)r
ma/2=F(frict)

F(frict)=

I guess I really don't know how to relate them?

I was also thinking that F(frict)rt=I(w(fin)-w(int))

I'm sorry I have to keep asking questions about it, this rotational stuff is killing me!
 
mburt3 said:
I set up an equation for the rotation, but I'm still a little confused on the rotation.

I(alpha)=F(friction)r
(1/2mr^2)a/R=F(frict)r
ma/2=F(frict)
Do this for rotation:
Fr = Iα = (1/2 mr²)α
Thus:
α = 2F/mr (note that the disk rotation is slowing down)

Now use kinematics to find ω as a function of time:
ω = ω0 - αt

Do the same thing for translation--find the velocity as a function of time.

Then solve for the time when the condition for rolling without slipping is met.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top