Angular velocity and regular velocity

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario involving a pole of mass M and length L on a frictionless table, a particle of the same mass M collides with the pole at its edge with a velocity V. After the collision, the particle sticks to the pole, and the discussion centers on calculating both the angular velocity and the regular velocity of the combined body. It is confirmed that conservation of linear momentum can be applied since there are no external horizontal forces acting on the system. The equation mv = 2mv' is validated for finding the regular velocity post-collision. The center of mass will shift, but the conservation principle remains applicable.
asi123
Messages
254
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have this pole with mass M and length L which is on a flat table with no friction. Another particle, which has the same mass M hits him on its edge with velocity V, which is vertical to the pole.
then, the particle sticks to the pole and they move together.
I need to find both the Angular velocity and the regular velocity of the new body.
My question is about the regular velocity, can I use the conservation of linear momentum law and say that mv = 2mv', and to find the regular velocity?
10x.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
asi123 said:
My question is about the regular velocity, can I use the conservation of linear momentum law and say that mv = 2mv', and to find the regular velocity?

Hi asi123! :smile:

Yes, you're right!

You can always use conservation of linear momentum in a direction if there are no external forces in that direction, because that's simply good ol' Newton's second law with a net force of zero. :wink:

Since there is no friction in this case, and the only external force is gravity, which is vertical, conservation of horizontal momentum will apply.

(don't forget that the centre of mass will be in a different place, of course)
 
10x.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top