Angular velocity of an atom in a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the angular velocity of an electron in a magnetic field, starting from the equation of motion in a rotating frame. The equation mω² - eBω - Ze²/4πε₀a³ = 0 is established, with the small magnetic field approximation leading to ω = eB/2m. Participants note that the dominant term in the square root suggests the need to consider the angular velocity when the magnetic field is zero. The analysis reveals that the electron's motion results in an elliptical orbit that precesses with angular velocity -qB/2m, ultimately combining both motions to determine the total angular velocity. The discussion concludes by confirming the relationship between the magnetic field and angular velocity in both circular and elliptical orbits.
Dazed&Confused
Messages
190
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The orbit of an electron (-e) around a nucleus (Ze) is a circular orbit of radius a in a plane perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field \textbf{B}. By writing the equation of motion in a frame rotating with the electron, show that the angular velocity \omega is given by one of the roots of the equation
<br /> m\omega^2 - eB\omega-Ze^2/4 \pi \epsilon_0 a^3 = 0<br />
Verif that for small values of B this is
<br /> \omega = \frac{eB}{2m}<br />

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So I've done the first part. The second part I would assume is just finding the root and making an approximation, so:
<br /> \omega = \frac{eB}{2m} \pm \sqrt{\left (\frac{eB}{2m}\right)^2 + \frac{Ze^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 m a^3}}
but the trouble is that the small B would suggest the second term in the square root is dominant. The approximation they used to get the same result before was that the first term is much smaller than the second, in the square root.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Dazed&Confused said:
the small BBB would suggest the second term in the square root is dominant
Quite so. It seems to me that the leading term is missing from the given answer, namely, the value that omega would have if B were zero.
 
I have to say the question wasn't exactly phrased like this. It wanted you to get the same result as the previous section, which was the one I quoted.
 
I think realized the issue, and it's down to me not paying attention. I looked at the example again and what they did was work in a rotating frame with angular velocity -qB/2m and from that got the equation
<br /> \ddot{\textbf{r}} = -\frac{k}{mr^2}\hat{\textbf{r}}<br />
where k= qq&#039;/4 \pi \epsilon_0. This produces an elliptical orbit. The ellipse precesses with angular velocity -qB/2m. Now for a circle this just means that you add the two motions to find the angular velocity. The angular velocity of the ellipse turned circle is
<br /> \sqrt{\frac{k}{mr^3}}
which is precisely that second term in the square root.

For completeness if you take their example the other way and assume that the magnetic field is perpendicular to the position vector then you have
<br /> \ddot{\textbf{r}} = -\left ( \frac{qB}{2m}\right)^2 \textbf{r}<br />
which is also an ellipse with angular velocity qB/2m, i.e. the first term.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top