Annihilation of Electron by Positron to Produce at least 2 Gamma Rays

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the annihilation of an electron and a positron must produce at least two gamma rays to satisfy conservation of energy and momentum. Initial momentum and energy conditions are analyzed, revealing contradictions when assuming a single gamma ray. The requirement for the gamma rays to travel in opposite directions is suggested to maintain zero final momentum. Additionally, the possibility of the electron and positron approaching each other to achieve initial momentum of zero is explored. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the fundamental principles of quantum field theory and the constraints of particle interactions.
tomnomnom
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is listed as follows: Show that conservation of energy and momentum require at least two gamma rays to e emitted in the annihilation of an electron by a positron.


Homework Equations



p(initial) = p(final)
E(initial) = E(final)
Total rest mass = 1.0218 MeV/c^2
p=hf/c
E=hf

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm checking to see whether my answer to this question is sufficient. The book (Wong) introduces the idea of a proton and anti-proton annihilation at rest, so I assumed that this process could occur at rest as well. Is that ok?

I first tried the production of a single gamma ray. However, since initial p=0, final p=0 as well. However, since initial E=/=0, and initial E = final E, then final E =/=0. These two are in contradiction to each other, since p=hf/c and E=hf. Combining, this gives p=E/c. Since c=/= 0, this equation is impossible.

I then explained that if the rays were traveling in opposite directions, this would allow for final p=0, fulfilling initial p=final p.

Do you guys believe that this is a sufficient answer? It is based upon the presumption that such an interaction can occur at rest.

Let me know, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just came up with a new thought, I could create a situation such that the electron and positron are approaching each other in such a manner that initial p=0. This would allow the dismissal of the "at rest" presumption. Thoughts?
 
This is the simplest exercise in quantum field theory, showing that the vertex of QED can't have all 3 particles on the mass shell.

You only need the energy-momentum equation describing the mass shell.

p^2 = m^2 \, \mbox{for the electron/positron and} \, p^2=0 \, \mbox{for the photon}
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top