Ansys - diffrence between ansys multiphysic and WorkBench?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Total_Damage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ansys Workbench
AI Thread Summary
Ansys Workbench serves as the comprehensive interface for managing the entire workflow of finite element analysis (FEA), including importing, meshing, and post-processing. In contrast, Ansys Multiphysics is the advanced solver capable of addressing complex problems across various physics domains such as structural, fluid, electromagnetic, and thermal analyses. Users inquired about unit conversion in Ansys Multiphysics, specifically changing units from inches. The discussion emphasizes that while tasks in Multiphysics can also be performed in Workbench, the two serve distinct purposes within the Ansys ecosystem. Understanding these differences is crucial for effectively utilizing the software for engineering simulations.
Total_Damage
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Ansys -- diffrence between ansys multiphysic and WorkBench?

Could anyone explain me, What is the diffrence between ansys multiphysic and WorkBench?
And how to change the units in Ansys in Multiphysic? Because I'm hving the Problem Description in Inch?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Could anyone explain me, What is the diffrence between ansys multiphysic and WorkBench?
And how to change the units in Ansys Multiphysic?
 


Ansys Workbench is the CAE interface for importing, meshing, running, and post-processing FEA problems. It's just the interface for running models start to finish.

Ansys Multiphysics is the top-level solver package for Ansys. It's able to solve problems in many different physics environments including structural, fluids, emag, thermal just to name a few.
 


thank u sir... one thing i enclosed the image, what the things are done in multi physis it could be done in workbench. but need more explanation sir... pls reply me
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top