Apparent visual magnitude/brightness problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter toph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Visual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the brightness of a distant star using its apparent magnitude and distance. The key equation mentioned is m = -2.5 log(b/b0), where b represents the star's brightness and b0 is the brightness of a reference star. The original poster initially struggled with rearranging this equation to find the star's brightness and sought alternative methods. Ultimately, after some reflection and stepping away from the problem, they realized the solution on their own. The conversation highlights the value of taking breaks when tackling complex problems.
toph
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi

I am working on a problem that requires me to calculate the brightness of a distant star. The problem i have is that the only information i have on the star is its distance and its apparent magnitude.

I think that i can solve this problem with the equation for magnitude i.e
m = -2.5 log(b/b0)

Where b = brightness of star and b0 = brightness of reference star with magnitude zero.

What i am struggling with is how to rearrange this equation to find the brightness of the distant star.
a) Can this equation be reaaranged to find the brightness required.
b) Is there another method that can help me find the required brightness with the limited information i have.
thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for looking but i think i have solved this problem!

I had spent several hours looking at this problem and then decided to ask for your advise.
But as is often the case when you walk away from the problem and think of something else you often realize where you were going wrong.

Thanks anyway.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top