Application of the equations of motion with constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a problem involving a bicyclist who accelerates to catch up with a friend riding at a constant speed. The initial calculations for the time and distance were incorrect due to misapplication of the equations of motion. The correct approach involves considering the relative motion between the two cyclists, factoring in the initial delay of two seconds for the bicyclist. The participants emphasize the importance of using the right equations and understanding the relationship between distance, time, and acceleration. Overall, the solution requires careful application of the equations of motion with constant acceleration.
sillybean
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Application of the equations of motion with constant acceleration

Homework Statement


A bicyclist is finishing his repair of a flat tire when a friend rides by with a constant speed of 4.0 m/s. Two seconds later the bicyclist hops on his bike and accelerates at 2.2 m/s^2 until he catches his friend.

a)How much time does it take until he catches his friend (after his friend passes him)?
b)How far has he traveled in this time?
c)What is his speed when he catches up?


Homework Equations



V=Vo + at

X= Xo + Vot + 1/2at^2

X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t



The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I tried figuring out the distance that the friend who passed the one doing repairs traveled in 2 seconds. Since his velocity was constant, I reasoned that he traveled 8 meters in 2 seconds. Then I plugged in the acceleration given in the problem along with the distance i figured into the equation: X= Xo + Vot + 1/2at^2. (I made Xo and Vo = zero since the guy doing the repairs starts from rest)

It looked like this: 8.0m = 0+0+ 1/2(2.2m/s^2)t^2
8.0m = 1.1m/s^2(t^2)
7.27s^2=t^2 (took square root of both sides)
t=2.7s

but that was wrong.

I then figured the distance I reasoned was wrong and actually used an equation this time.
I used X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t
X = 0 + 1/2 (4.0 m/s)(2.0s)
X = 4.0 m

I redid my work using this new distance (which I already thought was wrong >:C)
X= Xo + Vot + 1/2at^2
4.0m = 0 + 0 + 1/2(2.2)t^2
4.0 = 1.1t^2
3.6 = t^2 (square root)
t=1.9s

Guess what. It was wrong.

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose it has taken a total of t secs from the time when the friend passes him by to the time when he catches up. Then the friend has traveled at a const speed for t secs, whereas the repairing guy has traveled the same dist in (t-2) s. The rest you know.
 
sillybean said:

Homework Statement


A bicyclist is finishing his repair of a flat tire when a friend rides by with a constant speed of 4.0 m/s. Two seconds later the bicyclist hops on his bike and accelerates at 2.2 m/s^2 until he catches his friend.

a)How much time does it take until he catches his friend (after his friend passes him)?
b)How far has he traveled in this time?
c)What is his speed when he catches up?


Homework Equations



V=Vo + at

X= Xo + Vot + 1/2at^2

X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t



The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so I tried figuring out the distance that the friend who passed the one doing repairs traveled in 2 seconds. Since his velocity was constant, I reasoned that he traveled 8 meters in 2 seconds. Then I plugged in the acceleration given in the problem along with the distance i figured into the equation: X= Xo + Vot + 1/2at^2. (I made Xo and Vo = zero since the guy doing the repairs starts from rest)

It looked like this: 8.0m = 0+0+ 1/2(2.2m/s^2)t^2
8.0m = 1.1m/s^2(t^2)
7.27s^2=t^2 (took square root of both sides)
t=2.7s

but that was wrong.

I then figured the distance I reasoned was wrong and actually used an equation this time.
I used X= Xo + 1/2(Vo + V)t
X = 0 + 1/2 (4.0 m/s)(2.0s)
X = 4.0 m

I redid my work using this new distance (which I already thought was wrong >:C)
X= Xo + Vot + 1/2at^2
4.0m = 0 + 0 + 1/2(2.2)t^2
4.0 = 1.1t^2
3.6 = t^2 (square root)
t=1.9s

Guess what. It was wrong.

What am I doing wrong?

use concepts of relative velocity...this shall make the problem much easier...
 
thanks again you guys are life savers
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top