Applying a Bending Moment to a Plate with Forces

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simulating an in-plane bending moment of 200Nm on an 80mm tall plate using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The user seeks clarity on whether to apply forces according to situation (a) or situation (b), with both scenarios illustrating different force distributions along the plate's edge. It is noted that the stress distribution from a moment is greater away from the central axis, reaching zero at the axis itself, assuming a pure moment condition. The user expresses confusion and seeks a quick resolution to their simulation approach. Understanding the correct force application is crucial for accurate stress analysis in FEA.
SublimeTouch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm using FEA to simulate an in plane bending moment on a plate.

The moment is 200Nm, and the plate is 80mm tall.

Do I simulate the forces on the edge in situation (a) or situation (b)? It's a seemingly simple question, but people have put doubt in my head, I hoped a fresh mind might help. The length of the arrows represents magnitude, the arrow head represents direction. Shown is the right edge of the plate... That should cover everything.

(a)
|---->
|--->
|-->
|->
|<-
|<--
|<---
|<----

(b)
|->
|-->
|--->
|---->
|<----
|<---
|<--
|<-

A swift answer would be massively appreciated. My brain is frazzled right now.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The first one is the stress distribution of a moment, assuming the directions are correct.
Basically, the stress is greater as you move away from the central axis, and is 0 at the central axis (assuming pure moment).
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top