Appropriate arrangement of light meter circuit with LDR and resistor question:

AI Thread Summary
In a series light-meter circuit with a 12V cell, the arrangement of the LDR and resistor can impact the effectiveness of light measurement. The suggestion is to connect the LDR first, followed by the resistor, as this may influence the voltage drop across the LDR, which varies with light intensity. Understanding how to interpret the readings from the circuit is crucial, as it determines whether a higher or lower reading corresponds to increased light levels. The discussion emphasizes the importance of knowing how the LDR's resistance changes with light to accurately measure light intensity. Ultimately, the arrangement should facilitate a clear interpretation of the light readings.
Caiti
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you have a series 'light-meter' circuit with a cell EMF of 12V that must include both an LDR and a resistor only (in series), which way would you put them around to make this most effective and why?

~~~That is, would you have LDR then resistor, or resistor then LDR? And what would be the reasoning for this.

Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution



If you have a series 'light-meter' circuit with a cell EMF of 12V, wouldn't the appropriate arrangement of a resistor and an LDR be to have the positive end of the battery connected to the LDR and then the resistor, as opposed to having a resistor and then LDR? I can't work out why though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Caiti said:

Homework Statement



If you have a series 'light-meter' circuit with a cell EMF of 12V that must include both an LDR and a resistor only (in series), which way would you put them around to make this most effective and why?

~~~That is, would you have LDR then resistor, or resistor then LDR? And what would be the reasoning for this.

Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution



If you have a series 'light-meter' circuit with a cell EMF of 12V, wouldn't the appropriate arrangement of a resistor and an LDR be to have the positive end of the battery connected to the LDR and then the resistor, as opposed to having a resistor and then LDR? I can't work out why though.

Hi Caiti, Welcome to Physics Forums.

I don't see any "meter" in your light-meter :smile: Perhaps the answer lies in knowing how one is to interpret the "reading" from this device.
 
gneill said:
Hi Caiti, Welcome to Physics Forums.

I don't see any "meter" in your light-meter :smile: Perhaps the answer lies in knowing how one is to interpret the "reading" from this device.
Hey,
While I totally agree with your comment, this is a question I've pulled straight from a book of them - and there is definitely no additional information there. I'm assuming the exact way of measuring light was to be disregarded; however I'm obviously not certain about this.
 
Caiti said:
Hey,
While I totally agree with your comment, this is a question I've pulled straight from a book of them - and there is definitely no additional information there. I'm assuming the exact way of measuring light was to be disregarded; however I'm obviously not certain about this.

Well, why don't you propose a method of interpreting a 'reading' from the circuit? What kinds of things might be measured in an operating circuit? Do you want your reading to be larger when there's more light, or less light? What varies in an LDR with changes in light, and how does it vary?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top