I Arc diameter as a function of arc length and chord length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving a formula to determine the diameter of a bicycle tire based on its carcass width and the interior rim width. The user presents equations involving the arc length and angles but struggles to eliminate the variable r from the equations. It is concluded that the problem leads to a transcendental equation for r, which does not yield a straightforward analytical solution. Instead, a numerical or graphical solution is suggested as a viable approach to find the diameter. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in calculating tire dimensions accurately.
Robin64
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
I'm trying to come up with a formula that defines a bike tire's diameter as a function of interior rim width and tire carcass width
I'm trying to determine if a certain bicycle tire size will fit my bike, and that determination is based on the inflated diameter (or width) of the tire. As such, I'm trying to come up with a formula that will give me the diameter of a bicycle tire as a function of the tire's carcass width and the interior width of the rim. In the attached drawing, w is the interior rim width and S is the width of the tire carcass and the length of the arc ABC. I'm trying to derive the formula as a function of the only two knowns: w and S. Here's my derivation so far:
w=2r*sin(θ/2)
θ=2*arcsin[w/(2r)]
α=2π-θ=2π-2*arcsin[w/(2r)]

r=S/α

r=S/{2π-2*arcsin[w/(2r)]}

I can't see how to eliminate r.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-06-12 at 19.47.30.png
    Screen Shot 2019-06-12 at 19.47.30.png
    23.6 KB · Views: 355
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Look up Sagitta Theorem
 
That's just seems to introduce another unknown. I don't know the Sagitta length.
 
I can't see how to eliminate r.
[/QUOTE]
Looks like you do end up with a transcendental equation for r. My bad.
But you do have a solution albeit a numerical (or graphical) one.
 
Ok. I suspected that might the case. I can work with a graphical solution.

Thanks.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top