Arches or Beams: Why Arches Hold More Weight on Pasta Bridges

  • Thread starter Thread starter jadoreparis30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beams
AI Thread Summary
Pasta bridges designed with arches or triangular peaks can support more weight than flat beam structures due to their ability to distribute stresses more effectively. The arch shape is recognized as one of the strongest natural forms, allowing for better load management. Triangular arrangements also approximate this strength by providing stability and rigidity. The discussion highlights the importance of structural design in weight-bearing capacity. Further insights from an engineer are anticipated to deepen the understanding of these principles.
jadoreparis30
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Why do pasta bridges made with arches or triangular peaks hold more weight than those made with a flat beam? Assume the weight is attached to the base or deck of the bridge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An arch is inherently the strongest structure in nature, and a triangular arrangement is a reasonable approximation thereof. It has to do with how stresses are distributed. An engineer should be along shortly to give you more information.
 
That does make sense. Thank you for the input!
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top