ArcSin[2] {previously asked by a member}

  • Thread starter Thread starter rohanprabhu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Member
rohanprabhu
Messages
410
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Find the value of ArcSin[2].

NOTE: This question was asked in: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=226670 I made a new thread since I wasn't sure about my solution and didn't want to confuse the OP or anybody else.

Homework Equations



<br /> e^{i \theta} = \cos{(\theta)} + i \sin{(\theta)}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Let,

<br /> ArcSin[2] = k<br />

Then,

<br /> Sin[k] = 2<br />

Let,

<br /> \lambda = \cos{(k)} + i \sin{(k)}<br />

<br /> \sin{(k)} = \frac{\lambda - \sqrt{1 - \sin(k)^2}}{i}<br />

<br /> \sin{(k)} = \frac{\lambda - \sqrt{1 - (2)^2}}{i}<br />

<br /> \sin{(k)} = \frac{\lambda - \sqrt{3}i}{i}<br />

<br /> 2 = \frac{e^{ik}}{i} - \sqrt{3}<br />

<br /> e^{ik} = i(2 + \sqrt{3})<br />

<br /> k = \frac{1}{i} log_e(i(2 + \sqrt{3}))<br />

<br /> k = -i log_e(i(2 + \sqrt{3}))<br />

My question is.. is this the right way to do it? Or.. all the assumptions that I've taken.. are they correct?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems fine to me. When finding the inverse function of sine in exponential form, we get
\arcsin z = -i \log_e ( iz+ \sqrt{1-z^2}) and plugging z=2 there gets us the answer.
 
Gib Z said:
Seems fine to me. When finding the inverse function of sine in exponential form, we get
\arcsin z = -i \log_e ( iz+ \sqrt{1-z^2}) and plugging z=2 there gets us the answer.

thanks.. i didn't know there was a formula like this. :D
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top