Are Linear Operators Commutative When They Share Common Eigen Vectors?

frederick
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If A & B are linear operators, and AY=aY & BY=bY, what is the relationship between A & B such that e^A*e^B=e^(A+B)?? --where e^x=1+x+x^2/2+x^3/3!+...+x^n/n!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: write it out. And remember to watch out for which side you're multiplying on with A or B since, in general, AB \neq BA.
 
Since Y is a common eigenvector for A and B (assuming of course they don't have a continuous spectrum), then A and B commute. Then using Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula one sees that "A and B commute" is enough to have e^{A}e^{B}=e^{A+B}.

Daniel.
 
then A and B commute.
What am I missing? Consider the matrices:

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 3 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right) and \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 2 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

These share a common eigenvector [0 1]^T, but don't commute.
 
Yes, sloppy me, the theorem goes: 2 linear operators commute iff they share a COMPLETE system of common eigen vectors.

Daniel.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top