Are My Calculations for Forces Acting on a Point Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sl1ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Point
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating forces acting on a point, specifically examining the vertical and horizontal components of four forces. The calculations for the vertical components resulted in 35.357N directed south, while the horizontal components yielded 2.322N directed west. The magnitude of the resultant force was calculated to be approximately 6.138N, but further assistance was requested for determining the direction of the resultant and the equilibrant. Participants emphasized the importance of using trigonometric principles related to special triangles to simplify calculations. The graphical representation of the forces was confirmed to be correct, and understanding the properties of these triangles was highlighted as crucial for solving similar problems.
Sl1ver
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have done the following and would just like to know if it looks correct and any advice would be appreciated

Four forces acting on a point
30N west
35N south
20N west 45deg north
25N east 60deg north

1. The sum of the vertical components and state the direction
2. The sum of the horizontal components and state the direction
3. The magnitude of the resultant
4. The direction of the resultant
5. The magnitude and direction of the equilibrant


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Please note that I haven't done physics in 5 years and busy getting back into it

here is the diagram I came up with
Milnerton_20120910_00108.jpg


1. 20sin60 - 25sin45 - 35N
= 17,321N - 17,678N - 35N
= -35,357N
= 35,357N South

2. 20cos60 + 25cos45 - 30N
= 10N + 17,678N - 30N
= - 2,322N
= 2,322N West

3. R² = 35,357² + 2,322²
R = √35,357 + √2,322
= √37,679
= 6,138N

4 and 5 I need help in the right direction.

any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can add them graphically head-to-tail too of course.

You need to pick two directions to be "positive" ... I'd pick "North" and "West" but some people will pick "East" to be positive since that looks like an x-axis.
This can simplify your working.

A 45deg triangle has sides 1-1-√2
A 60-30 triangle has sides 1-2-√3

so. sin(45)=cos(45)=1/√2
so. sin(60)= √3/2, cos(60)=1/2

For 4 and 5:
Once you have the total of the N-S and E-W components (and their directions) - draw them in on your graph.

From there you can draw in the resultant.
The resultant arrow will tell you how to get the direction.
To see what is expected - look at how the question describes the magnitude and direction of vectors that are not exactly on a N-S or E-W axis.
 
Thank you for the feedback. I appreciate the advice!

Is the graph I drew correct?

can you maybe just explain to me what you mean with
"A 45deg triangle has sides 1-1-√2
A 60-30 triangle has sides 1-2-√3

so. sin(45)=cos(45)=1/√2
so. sin(60)= √3/2, cos(60)=1/2"
 
The graph you drew appears to be what was intended.
You have calculated the components of the resultant already - draw them on a similar graph. You are basically reversing the procedure you just used.

The stuff about triangles:
All trigonometry is based on right-angled triangles.
The angles used in the problem relate to a set of "special triangles" that have well-known and easily remembered properties. I brought it up because I wasn't sure you'd noticed.

----------------------
45-45-90 is what you get cutting a square in half corner-to-corner.
The ratio of it's sides are 1:1:√2 - the longest side is always the hypotenuse.

By definition: if the length of the hypotenuse is 1, then the length of the opposite side is the sine of the angle; if the adjacent side is 1, then the opposite side is the tangent of the angle and the hypotenuse is the secant. That is what those trig functions mean.

So:
tan(45)=1, and sec(45)=√2, can be read right off ...
sin(45)=1/√2 is obtained from similar triangles.
... no need for a calculator ;)

If you put two squares side-by-side to make an oblong, and cut the oblong corner-to-corner, you get a 30-60-90 triangle.
The ratio of the sides are 1-2-√3

Thus: tan(60)=√3 ... etc.

Whenever you see the angles 30, 45, or 60, you should think of these triangles. Also if you have a triangle where the two short sides are the same, or where one short side is half the hypotenuse.

Also learn 3-4-5 and 5-12-13.
3-4-5 triangles come up a lot!

http://www.onlinemathlearning.com/special-right-triangles.html
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top