Are these two calculations of electrostatic force correct?

Front Office
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I was watching a show the other night about the Large Hadron Collider, and I got to wondering how much force it would take to push two uranium nuclei right up against each other. I figured it would be on the order of a thousandth, maybe a millionth of a pound, which seems like a lot, considering how small an atomic nucleus is.

Boy, was I surprised. IT'S NEARLY 2,000 LBS!

Can that be correct?

I assumed 92 protons per nucleus, each having a positive charge of 1.602x10^-19 coulombs. I assumed a distance between nuclear centers of 15 femtometers (15x10^-15 m). And I used Coulomb's Law for the force between charged objects.

Since I was on a role, I then calculated how much force it would take to separate all the electrons in a copper penny from all the protons, assuming all the positive and negative charges are arranged as penny-sized disks that are 1.55 millimeters apart, which is the thickness of a penny according to Wikipedia. Of course it would be impossible to do this experimentally. But assuming two penny-sized disks separated by 1.55 mm, THE FORCE OF ATTRACTION EXCEEDS THE WEIGHT OF THE EARTH!

That much force to separate the charges would, as I calculate it, would require an amount of energy on the order of two centuries of human energy use (at our current rate of ~13-trillion watts).

I must be making an error.

I assumed 3.5 grams for a copper penny, 100% copper, atomic number 29, and atomic weight 63.5. Used Coulomb's Law here also.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Front Office said:
...
Since I was on a role, I then calculated how much force it would take to separate all the electrons in a copper penny from all the protons, assuming all the positive and negative charges are arranged as penny-sized disks that are 1.55 millimeters apart, which is the thickness of a penny according to Wikipedia. Of course it would be impossible to do this experimentally. But assuming two penny-sized disks separated by 1.55 mm, THE FORCE OF ATTRACTION EXCEEDS THE WEIGHT OF THE EARTH! ...

These 1.55 mm would not be the most difficult part of separating electrons from copper.
The atomic radius of copper is 130 pm, with is about 10-7 smaller, and therefore the force must be 10+14 larger.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top