ARGH this is giving me a headache

  • Thread starter Thread starter schattenjaeger
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on difficulties with rotational dynamics, particularly involving a pulley system with varying weights. The main problem involves calculating the tension in a cord connected to a 31kg weight and understanding the relationship between linear and angular acceleration. The correct approach involves using the moment of inertia to find linear acceleration rather than directly calculating angular acceleration. Additionally, for calculating net torque on a wheel, it's important to sum individual torques while considering the direction of forces. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of these calculations and encourages persistence in solving them.
schattenjaeger
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
ARGH this is giving me a headache...

I was cruising along fine until rotational dynamics, which heck, I thought I understood fine anyways, but apparently I was wrong. Ok, one problem that's killing me is as follows:
A pulley(in the form of a uniform disk)with mass 79kg and radius .18m is attached to the ceiling and rotates with no friction about its pivot. Acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2, masses are connected by massless cord. You have the pulley hanging from a cord which weighs 79kg(the pulley does, not the cord), on its left is hanging a 55kg weight, and 1.3m below it but hanging on the other side is a 31kg weight, the tension in cord running from the 31kg weight to the pulley is the goal here, and I'm stumped. I got the moment of inertia of the pulley as 1.2798, and was mostly kinda fumbling in the dark from there. I think T1(the tension I'm looking for)can be given by T1-mg=ma, so I need to find a, which I guess I can get from finding the angular acceleration, which is hurting me:(

Other stumping question...well, it's hard to describe, but you have 3 forces being exerted on a 7.2kg wheel, outer radius and an inner radius, and it wants the magnitude of the net torque, which I THOUGHT was easy, but obviously I need to do something with that mass, which I didn't, so I have no clue as well
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is one heavy pulley!

There are only two forces acting on the 31kg mass, gravity and tension. You can solve for the 31kg's acceleration (it's the same as the entire system) without using tension, so then you throw this acceleration at F_g + T = ma and solve for T.

However, this problem has a few potentially tricky calculation parts, so your error might not be in the concepts. Show your work if this doesn't help you.

--J
 
.

I completely understand your frustration with rotational dynamics. It can be a difficult concept to grasp and can definitely give anyone a headache. It seems like you have a good understanding of the problem, but just need a little help with the calculations.

For the pulley problem, you are correct in thinking that the tension can be found using T1-mg=ma. However, instead of finding the angular acceleration, you can use the moment of inertia of the pulley to find the linear acceleration of the masses. The equation for this would be a=(m1-m2)g/(m1+m2+I/R^2), where m1 and m2 are the masses and I is the moment of inertia of the pulley. Once you have the linear acceleration, you can use it to solve for the tension using T1=m1a+mg.

For the second problem, the net torque can be found by summing up the individual torques from each force. The equation for torque is T=rFsinθ, where r is the radius, F is the force, and θ is the angle between the force and the radius. Make sure to take into account the direction of the torque, as it can be either positive or negative depending on the direction of rotation.

I hope this helps and good luck with your rotational dynamics problems! Don't give up, you got this!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top