At 10 m/s, how high is this second hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deanine3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill
AI Thread Summary
A car coasting from a 60m high hill will reach a speed of approximately 34.29 m/s at the bottom without friction. To find the height of a second hill where the car reaches a speed of 10 m/s, the equation h = (1/2)(v^2)/g is used. After correcting calculations, the height of the second hill is determined to be approximately 5.1 meters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying units and understanding the physics equations involved. Overall, the calculations confirm the relationship between height and speed in a frictionless scenario.
deanine3
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a car starts coasting from the top of a hill that is 60m high. (a)How fast will it be going at the bottom of the hill if there is no friction? (b) For the same car starting at the top of another hill and reaching the bottom, without friction, at 10 m/s, how high is this second hill?


Homework Equations


(a) mgh= 1/2mv^2
(b) mgh = 1/2mv^2


The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I solved as v= 34.29 m/s^2
(b) mgh-1/2mv^2 m cancel each other out, then /g making the equation
h= (1/2)(g)(v^2)
I end up with h= (1/2)(9.8 m/s^2) (10 m/s^2)= 490m. I'm not sure if I am using the information given correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're doing fine, but you multiplied by g instead of dividing by it.
 
oh, sorry, h= (1/2)(10 m/s^2)/(9.8 m/s^2)= 5.10? Does that look right? Am I supposed to divide 0.5 x 10 x 10 then/ 9.8 or is it 0.5 x 10 (don't square)/9.8? It seems like the 10 is squared and the 9.8 has the seconds squared.
 
deanine3 said:
oh, sorry, h= (1/2)(10 m/s^2)/(9.8 m/s^2)= 5.10? Does that look right?
yes, 5.1 meters
Am I supposed to divide 0.5 x 10 x 10 then/ 9.8
yes
or is it 0.5 x 10 (don't square)/9.8?
no
It seems like the 10 is squared and the 9.8 has the seconds squared.
Sometimes it's best to leave off the units when doing the math, then add them back in at the end. You have
h = 1/2(v^2)/g which is h = 1/2(10)(10)/9.8 = 5.1
the units are [(m/s)(m/s)]/[m/s^2] = [m^2/s^2][(s^2)/m] = m(the height must be in length units, i.e. meters).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top