At What Wavelength is the Peak of the Planet's Blackbody Intensity Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCammen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the peak wavelength of a Jupiter-like planet's blackbody intensity function, given its distance from a Sun-like star and various parameters such as the star's temperature and luminosity. The Stefan-Boltzmann law is applied to determine the incident flux on the planet, which is treated as a perfect blackbody that absorbs and emits energy. A key point raised is the need to convert the emission into wavelength using Planck's law, emphasizing the importance of understanding the relationship between temperature and wavelength. The conversation highlights the process of equating the absorbed flux to the emitted flux to find the planet's temperature. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies the steps needed to solve the problem effectively.
TheCammen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine you are trying to detect a Jupiter-like planet located 7.5E11 m from a Sun-like star. At what wavelength is the peak of the planet's Planck blackbody intensity function (assume the planet is a perfect blackbody)?

Radius of Planet r = 7E7 m
Radius of Star R = 7E8 m
Temp of Star = 5800 k
Luminosity of Star = 3.8E26 J/s

Homework Equations



Stefan-Boltzman law j = σT^4
Total Incident Flux (σ T^4 r^2) /distance^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, my professor gave me the equation for Stefan's law. He then gave us the task of determining the incident flux upon the planet given by the star on the planet. If the planet is a perfect black body, then the planet will absorb and then emit all this energy. I can go through the steps to show you how I determined the Total Incident Flux equation. But I believe that it's correct.

The problem I am having now is how to change this emission to a wavelength. I feel like I need a nudge in the right direction. Do I need to rearrange Planck's law and solve for wavelength at the temperature of the planet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've got there looks like a flux density at the distance of the planet. It's not a total incident flux. Remember the planet only absorbs the flux crossing through it's cross section. Then, sure, equate that to outgoing flux over the whole surface of the planet, assuming it's at a constant temperature. Then you should be able to find the temperature of the planet. Then, also sure, use Planck's law to find the wavelength at the peak.
 
Thanks! I see how to do it now. I "knew" how to solve it. The concepts just weren't clicking. Gracias!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top