Atomic Force Microscopy in hard and soft matter physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the modes of operation of Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and their application in both hard and soft matter physics. Participants explore the difficulties and limitations associated with each mode and how these challenges might be addressed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant identifies three modes of AFM operation: contact, tapping, and non-contact, and questions their applicability in both hard and soft matter physics.
  • Another participant requests links to relevant reading materials related to AFM.
  • A participant shares several papers but notes a lack of clear references to the topic of AFM modes in the context of hard and soft matter.
  • It is suggested that for soft samples, non-contact or tapping modes are preferable to avoid damage, while for hard samples, contact mode may be more suitable despite concerns about potential scratching.
  • There is a reiteration of the idea that contact mode penetrates the liquid layer to image the surface, while non-contact mode oscillates above the fluid layer, raising questions about the best practices for imaging hard samples.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best AFM mode for hard samples, with some suggesting contact mode while others raise concerns about scratching. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal approach for hard samples.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the effectiveness of different AFM modes for hard versus soft samples, and there are unresolved questions about the potential for damage in contact mode.

JD_PM
Messages
1,125
Reaction score
156
I am studying the modes of operation of the Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). I know there are three: contact, tapping and non-contact.

Are they really used in both hard and soft matter physics? If so, how are the difficulties/limitations that they present overcome?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post some links to the reading you've been doing about this so far? Thanks. :smile:
 
OK after a little bit more reading I think that for soft samples the best is to use either non-contact or tapping mode, because prevents the sample from being damaged. However, what about hard samples?

In contact mode the probe will penetrate the liquid layer to image the underlying surface, whereas in non-contact mode an AFM will oscillate above the adsorbed fluid layer to image both the liquid and surface. So this suggests that for hard samples the best option is contact mode. Would not the contact mode still scratch the sample though?
 
JD_PM said:
OK after a little bit more reading I think that for soft samples the best is to use either non-contact or tapping mode, because prevents the sample from being damaged. However, what about hard samples?

In contact mode the probe will penetrate the liquid layer to image the underlying surface, whereas in non-contact mode an AFM will oscillate above the adsorbed fluid layer to image both the liquid and surface. So this suggests that for hard samples the best option is contact mode. Would not the contact mode still scratch the sample though?
Issue has been solved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K