Attraction between two charges in QED

exponent137
Messages
562
Reaction score
35
Attraction between nuclei and electron in QED is the most simply described with Feynman's diagram and calculation, when an electron fastly flow close to a nuclei. (?? scattering)

1. But how, in QED, to describe attraction between almost standstill electron and nuclei.
In classical physics this gives F=e^2/r^2.
Is this constant flow of virtual photons, which gives this attraction?

2. What is difference between classical and QED scattering of an electron on the nuclei?

I read some Feynman books, so you can give me its references.


Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In feynman's "Feynman Lecture on Gravitation" eq. 3.2.8 is divided in two parts.

= (j4' j4)/k^2+1/(w^2-k^2)(j1' j1+j2' j2)
j4 part is instantaneous, other tho parts are retarded.

j4 part means instantaneously acting Couloumb's potential.

But, Couloumb's potential in classical electrodynamics is not instantaneous.
For instance if sun suddenly dissapears, its gravity on Earth will disapear only after 8 minuts. The same is at one charge (on smaller distance).
How to explain this? Is maybe instantaneous part only approximation, or?
 
Carlip http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909087
wrote about how speed of planet compensates (centralise force) so that planet behaves similarly that gravitational interaction is instantenous. But how this connect with Feynman's instantenous force?
 
It dependas how you formulate the theory.

In high energy physics you insist on explicit covariante and chose a covariant gauge. In this gauge scattering processes are "easy", whereas bound states are "hard".

But you can chose a different gauge, e.g. the Coulomb gauge (which is preferred as only in this gauge static charges do not radiate). If you eliminate A°(x) which is unphysical and solve the Gauss law contraint you find a Hamiltonian with the Coulomb term

V_C = e^2 \int d^2x \int d^3y \frac{\rho(x) \rho(y)}{|x-y|}

describing the Coulomb interaction between the fermionic charge density operators.

I hope this makes it clear that QED contains ordinary electrostatic interaction as well. It's only in certain gauges that this isn't obvious.
 
There have been plentiful of articles in the "American Journal of Physics" explaining how the instantaneous Coulombic part is modified by the photonic part so as to yield a retarded interaction.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top