Atwood's fall machine w. sylinder (again?)

  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Machine
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Atwood’s fall machine consists of two weight of mass m1 and m2 attached with a massless
rope running around a spinning wheel of mass M and radius R without slipping. The spinning wheel is attached at its center and rotates around an axis through its center without friction.

Find velocity of each of the weights as a function of their vertical positions.

Homework Equations


E = constant

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm assuming that one m1 < m2 so that the system will accelerate in the direction of where m2 is hanging.

I'm sure I should be using energyconsideration here, but the only thing I'm not sure how to attack is the fact that we have two masses on each side of the wheel. What is then my total potential energy to start with? I tought about focusing my attention on the center of mass, but then I don't see how I get the individual velocity of each of the masses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi center o bass! :wink:
center o bass said:
I'm sure I should be using energyconsideration here, but the only thing I'm not sure how to attack is the fact that we have two masses on each side of the wheel. What is then my total potential energy to start with? …

You're only interested in the change in PE …

just add the changes for each mass (one will be positive, and one negative, of course). :smile:
 
I realize that the velocity of each of the masses must be the same. And that kinetic energy therefore goes into each of the masses individually pluss the rotational kinetic energy of the wheel. But I still don't understand how to think about the potential energy... Just sitting there at the same height, they should have a potential energy of mgh each, but then I don't get the correct andswer.
 
Ah...! You said it ;) Thanks a lot!