Atwoods MAchine with two pulleys and three masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter karabear1919
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine Pulleys
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two pulleys and three masses, specifically determining the acceleration constraint in terms of the acceleration of mass 1 and the tension in the string of the second pulley. The initial analysis suggests that the acceleration of mass 3 is half that of mass 2, leading to a potential relationship where the acceleration of mass 1 is double that of mass 3. Participants recommend drawing free body diagrams for each mass to visualize forces and apply Newton's second law to derive the necessary equations. The approach emphasizes substituting these equations to find the desired relationship between the accelerations and tension. A systematic breakdown of these steps is deemed essential for clarity and accuracy in solving the problem.
karabear1919
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A system contains two pulleys, over the first pulley there is mass 3, m_3, on one end of the rope. the other end of that rope is connected to the second pully. Hung on the second pulley are mass 2, m_2, and mass 1, m_1. Find the acceleration constraint in terms of a_1 and the tension in the string of the second pulley.


Homework Equations


ma=Fnet


The Attempt at a Solution


the change in the string over pulley 1 causes a_3=.5*a_2 and a_2=a_1 (not sure?)
so a_1=2a_3?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would suggest first drawing free body diagrams for all the masses involved, then using those to find the net force on the masses (and relate the net force to accelerations of the objects using the equation you give). You'll get a number of equations that you'll just have to substitute into each other to find the relationship (constraint) you desire. Seeing those steps in more detail would be productive.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top