Average of Dirac Delta-Function over Double Gaussian Variables

fast_eddie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need to work out an expression for the average of a Dirac delta-function
\delta(y-y_n)
over two normally distributed variables: z_m^{(n)}, v_m^{(n)}

So I take the Fourier integral representation of the delta function:

\delta(y-y_n)=\int \frac{d\omega}{2\pi} e^{i\omega(y-y_n)} =\int \frac{d\omega}{2\pi} e^{i\omega y}e^{-i\omega y_n}

And I already know from a previous calculation that I can express the y_n's in terms of z's and v's:

y_n = \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_n}}{\pi} \sum_{k ≠ 0} \frac{Re[z_m^{(n)*} v_m^{(n)}]}{k}

Where the alpha can essentially be regarded as a coefficient for our purposes. So I substitute this into my integral above, ignoring the exp(iωy) part for the moment, and write out the expression for the average over the variables z and v:

\int e^{-i\omega \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_n}}{\pi} \sum_{k ≠ 0} \frac{Re[z_m^{(n)*} v_m^{(n)}]}{k}} \frac{e^{-\frac{(z^{(n)}_m)^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi z^{(n)}_m}} \frac{e^{-\frac{(v^{(n)}_m)^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi v^{(n)}_m}} d z^{(n)}_m dv^{(n)}_m

where I've introduced the Gaussian distributions of z and v to take the average over these variables. And here is where I am stuck. I am pretty sure that I must do something like make a change of variables in order to simplify this integral, with terms that will go to 1 as they are just the integral over a probability distribution, and some infinite product term will be left over. The exact step to take next in order to achieve this is where I am stuck, as I don't really know what to do with the Real part of the product between v and the conjugate of z to simplify the exponential in the integrand. Any help or tips would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fast_eddie said:
I need to work out an expression for the average of a Dirac delta-function
\delta(y-y_n)
over two normally distributed variables: z_m^{(n)}, v_m^{(n)}

So I take the Fourier integral representation of the delta function:

\delta(y-y_n)=\int \frac{d\omega}{2\pi} e^{i\omega(y-y_n)} =\int \frac{d\omega}{2\pi} e^{i\omega y}e^{-i\omega y_n}

And I already know from a previous calculation that I can express the y_n's in terms of z's and v's:

y_n = \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_n}}{\pi} \sum_{k ≠ 0} \frac{Re[z_m^{(n)*} v_m^{(n)}]}{k}

Where the alpha can essentially be regarded as a coefficient for our purposes. So I substitute this into my integral above, ignoring the exp(iωy) part for the moment, and write out the expression for the average over the variables z and v:

\int e^{-i\omega \frac{\sqrt{\alpha_n}}{\pi} \sum_{k ≠ 0} \frac{Re[z_m^{(n)*} v_m^{(n)}]}{k}} \frac{e^{-\frac{(z^{(n)}_m)^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi z^{(n)}_m}} \frac{e^{-\frac{(v^{(n)}_m)^2}{2}}}{\sqrt{2\pi v^{(n)}_m}} d z^{(n)}_m dv^{(n)}_m

where I've introduced the Gaussian distributions of z and v to take the average over these variables. And here is where I am stuck. I am pretty sure that I must do something like make a change of variables in order to simplify this integral, with terms that will go to 1 as they are just the integral over a probability distribution, and some infinite product term will be left over. The exact step to take next in order to achieve this is where I am stuck, as I don't really know what to do with the Real part of the product between v and the conjugate of z to simplify the exponential in the integrand. Any help or tips would be greatly appreciated, thanks.

Your question is hard to follow because of notational issues, etc., so let me re-phrase it. You have two random variables U and V with probability densities f(u) and g(v) (although, in this case, it looks like f and g are the same function). I have dropped the 'n' superscript amd 'm' subscripts, as they serve no useful purpose here (but may be needed somewhere else---if so, put them back after completing the calculation.) You say that f(u) and g(v) are Gaussian functions, but that is not what you wrote later: you have
f(x) = g(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi x}} e^{-x^2/2}\; (x = u \text{ or }v). These are not Gaussians; true Gaussians would be
f(x) = g(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} e^{-x^2/2}, with no ##\sqrt{x}## in the normalizing factors. So, I don't know whether you just made a typo, or whether your f and g are not truly Gaussians.

Anyway, you also have a variable you call ##y_n##, which is a function of u and v; let's call it ##z(u,v)##. Finally, you have a parameter, y, and you want to evaluate
\int \delta(y - z(u,v)) f(u) g(v) \; du \, dv. Your function z(u,v) happens to be given in terms of some type of series, but it looks like the series is divergent:
z(u,v) = \frac{\sqrt{\alpha}}{\pi} \sum_{k \neq 0} \frac{\text{Re}(u^* v)}{k}<br /> = \frac{\sqrt{\alpha} \:\text{Re}(u^* v)}{\pi} \sum_{k \neq 0} \frac{1}{k}. That series is divergent, or possibly undefined, so I have no idea how you are supposed to get your function z(u,v).

Finally, the last expression you wrote has no 'y' in it, and I do not see where it went.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply, I realize it is hard for me to explain the question without writing up lots of the context that came before it. I will see if I can try to make more sense of it for myself and then if I can phrase it more clearly here, thank you anyway.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top