Avoid Car Crash - Algebra Based

AI Thread Summary
Speedy Sue, driving at 30.0 m/s, enters a tunnel and notices a van 155 m ahead moving at 5.00 m/s. She can only decelerate at -2.00 m/s² due to wet conditions, which leads to calculations indicating she will travel 225 m in 15 seconds. The van, moving at its speed, will cover 75 m in the same time, resulting in a total distance of 230 m from Sue's starting point. Ultimately, calculations show that a collision occurs at 12 seconds, with Sue's car at 216 m and the van at 215 m, confirming that Sue does collide with the van.
Dig
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


35. Speedy Sue, driving at 30.0 m/s,
enters a one-lane tunnel. She then
observes a slow‐moving van 155 m
ahead traveling at 5.00 m/s. Sue
applies her brakes but can accelerate
only at ‐2.00m/s2 because the road is
wet. Will there be a collision? State
how you decide. If yes, determine
how far into the tunnel and at what
time the collision occurs. If no,
determine the distance of closest
approach between Sue’s car and the
van.

Homework Equations


s = v0(t1 - t0) + 1/2a(t1 - t0)^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I have reached an answer to this problem, but I am not sure that it is correct.

I'll copy my notes as I wrote them:

We need to find displacement in the amount of time decelerating at -2.00m/s^2.
v0 = 30m/s
a = -2.00m/s^2

So, I need time to solve for the displacement, so I used t=v/a to get 15seconds. This was (30m/s)/(-2.00m/s^2) which gave me -15s. I am not sure if I went astray here because I interpreted the -15s as the time it would take for the vehicle to stop.

I plugged this all into the displacement equation to get s=225m

So, if Suzie is going 30m/s and decelerating at -2.00m/s^2, she will not stop until 225m after 15 seconds.THE VAN
The van would need to travel 70+ meters in 15 seconds in order to avoid collision. I came to this conclusion since the van is already 155m ahead of Suzie and she ends up at 225m.

The velocity of the van is 5m/s, so in 15 seconds, the van will travel 75 meters. Adding this distance to the distance between Suzie's vehicle and the van gives us 230 meters which is clear of the 225 meters that Suzie's vehicle will travel.

Distance of closest approach
I am not entirely sure about this one, but I would imagine that the distance of closest approach would be when Suzie's vehicle comes to a halt at 225m. This would make the closest approach 5m.Any help is very much appreciated.
Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figuring out how long it would take for Sue to come to rest (assuming no collision) is a good first step. That's the 15 seconds you calculated.

Now do this. Write expressions for the position of Sue as a function of time and the position of the van as a function of time. Using those expressions, how would you solve for the time of the collision (or prove that there isn't one)?
 
Doc Al said:
Figuring out how long it would take for Sue to come to rest (assuming no collision) is a good first step. That's the 15 seconds you calculated.

Now do this. Write expressions for the position of Sue as a function of time and the position of the van as a function of time. Using those expressions, how would you solve for the time of the collision (or prove that there isn't one)?

Thank you for your reply.

Here are my attempts.

Sues' Car: f(t) = v0(t) + (1/2)a(t)^2
For example: f(3) = 30(3) + (1/2)-2.00(3)^2
Which gives 81meters out of 225meters which is the total she traveled in 15 seconds.

The Van: f(t) = vt
For example: f(4) = 5.00(4)
Which gives us 20meters out of the total 75meters that she traveled in 15 seconds.

I am not entirely sure how I would go about solving this besides finding and comparing the positions of both of the vehicles at each second interval up to the 15 seconds when Sues' vehicle comes to a complete halt.

I came to my original conclusion by comparing the final distances of both of the vehicles.

Any help is appreciated :).
 
Last edited:
I have found the answer manually using the functions I created and my calculator. I would still like to know if there is an easier way to do it. I simply did the calculations and wrote down the results for each second up to 15. For the van's calculations, I added each result to 155meters which was the gain it had on Susie's car.

It appears that Susie's vehicle catches up to and hits the van at 12 seconds. The calculation for Susie's vehicle at 12 seconds is 216m while the van is at 215m. The van continues to be hit by Susie's vehicle during the 13'th second and then escapes it's clutches at second 14 by 1m.

I am so glad I asked you guys for help on this as I was pretty sure of myself. Thank you so much :).
 
Dig said:
Sues' Car: f(t) = v0(t) + (1/2)a(t)^2
For example: f(3) = 30(3) + (1/2)-2.00(3)^2
Which gives 81meters out of 225meters which is the total she traveled in 15 seconds.
Good. I would write the position of Sue's car like this:

x_1 = v_0t + 1/2at^2 = 30t -t^2

The Van: f(t) = vt
For example: f(4) = 5.00(4)
Which gives us 20meters out of the total 75meters that she traveled in 15 seconds.
Since the van has a 155 m head start, I'd write its position (measured from the starting point of Sue's car) as:

x_2 = x_0 + v_0t= 155 + 5t

I am not entirely sure how I would go about solving this besides finding and comparing the positions of both of the vehicles at each second interval up to the 15 seconds when Sues' vehicle comes to a complete halt.
That's OK, but it's the hard way. Instead, let the equations do the work. In order for a collision, car and van need to be at the same position. Set up an equation and solve for the time when x_1 = x_2.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top