Axial field from a pointed tip inside cylinder with flows

Madoro
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I have an experimental problem that I don´t know how to express theoretically.
It consists on a tip at high voltage inside an earthed cylinder, where a discharge is produced. The discharge is radial, since is the shortest distance to the wall, and produces ions, which are dragged out by an air flow f1, generating an electrical field in the axial direction Ex1 (fig. discharge.png).
There is an extra air flow f2 that joins f1 into a surrounding earthed cylinder, and then the field by the ions changes its value, Ex, since the flow is bigger and is further away from the discharge.

I have no clue neither how to calculate Ex1 nor Ex2. The attempt at a solution

I have tried to solve it supposing the discharge as a charged ring, similarly to how is done in this thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=497126&highlight=radial+field+flow
Therefore, the electrical field at the output of the inner cylinder would be:
E_{x1}=\frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{L_i}{(L_i^2+R_i^2)^{3/2}}

and therefore in the outer:
E_x=E_{x1}+\frac{q}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{L_o}{(L_o^2+R_o^2)^{3/2}}

obtaining the solution shown in Ex.png.

First of all, is a good approximation the rings to the solution?
and secondly, why the axial field does this increase in the curve? should´t it be constantly decreasing?

Any help would be really appreciated, since I’m stuck here for long time now.
Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • discharge.png
    discharge.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 528
  • Ex.png
    Ex.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
Second attempt:

I divide the problem in two parts, first inside the inner cylinder and then in the bigger one. I'll begin in the inner one where discharge is started
I suppose a radial discharge from the tip to the walls:
E_r=\frac{U}{r Log(R_i/R_{tip})}
being U the applied voltage and R_{tip} the radius of the needle's tip.

The governing equations (all in cylindrical coordinates) are the Poisson equation for the field inside the inner cylinder:
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial (r E_r)}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial E_z}{\partial z}=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} (1)

and the convection-diffussion equation for the charge density:
\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}=D_i \nabla^2 \rho + \nabla \cdot (u \rho)=0 (2)

where D_i is the diffusion coefficient and is so small that this term can be neglected. Velocities in axial and radial directions are:
u_r=Z_i E_r
u_z=u_g+Z_i E_z
with u_g the f_1 flow velocity.

Therefore eq. (2):
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial (r Z_i E_r \rho)}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial ((u_g+ Z_i E_z) \rho))}{\partial z}=0 (2b)

Solving eq. (1) and (2b):

\frac{\partial E_z}{\partial z}=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} (3)

Z_i E_r \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial r}+(u_g+ Z_i E_z) \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z} + \rho Z_i \frac{\partial E_z}{\partial z}=0 (4)

Substituting eq. (3) into eq.(4):
Z_i E_r \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial r}+(u_g+ Z_i E_z) \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z} + \frac{\rho^2 Z_i}{\epsilon_0}=0 (4b)


Therefore I have a system of 2 equations (3 & 4b) with 2 unknowns (E_z and \rho(z,r)), but I'm totally stuck on how to solve it.

Please, correct me if my approach of the problem is not correct or there is any mistake in the resolution. I could use some software to solve the system of equations, but I'm not sure if they are resoluble.

Thanks in advance.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top