Ball rolling down a ramp, no slipping, + friction (conceptual question)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a ball rolling down a ramp without slipping, focusing on the role of friction and its impact on energy. Participants explore the relationship between linear and angular kinetic energy, the nature of static friction, and whether friction does work on the ball.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the friction force removes energy from the ball, noting that it affects rotation but may not change energy forms.
  • Another participant argues that static friction does not perform work since there is no relative movement at the contact point, suggesting that the energy gain is sourced from gravity, not friction.
  • A later reply clarifies that the method used to analyze the problem may not be wrong, but the terminology regarding work done by friction could be misleading.
  • Some participants assert that the net work done by static friction is zero, as it balances linear and rotational work, leading to no change in total kinetic energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of friction in energy transfer, with some asserting that friction does not change the total kinetic energy, while others debate the implications of referring to friction as doing work. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the terminology and conceptual understanding of friction's role.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions and assumptions about work done by friction and its relationship to energy changes in the system. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in the application of concepts related to static friction and energy conservation.

joe5185
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
So if a ball is rolling down a ramp and not slipping, you have two torques... the mg*sin(theta) portion of gravity and the (mu)mgcos(theta) for friction. My question is this: Does this friction force remove energy from the ball? (I know it affects the balls rotation but this is just changing forms of energy) My teacher did a problem in class where we wanted to know the final velocity of the ball at the end of the ramp and I subtracted the work due to friction FD. Was I wrong to do this and if so why (my teacher said it was wrong but couldn't say why uggh)? Thanks so much guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually static friction isn't considered as a force that performs work, since there's no movement between surfaces at the point of contact. If a flat bed truck is accelerating on a level road with a box on the flat bed without sliding so that the box accelerates at the same rate as the truck, then from the ground frame of reference the work performed on the box equals the friction force (between flat bed and box) times the distance traveled with respect to the ground, but the source of energy is the trucks engine, not friction force.

Back to the ball rolling down a ramp, if you calculated the "work done" related to friction, that should equal the gain in angular kinetic energy of the ball, but the source of that energy is gravity, not the friction force. The total energy of the ball increases by m g h (mass, gravity, height of ramp), some of it linear kinetic energy, some of it angular kinetic energy.
 
thanks that's perfect
 
To clarify, the method you used may not have been wrong, only referring to it as work done by friction. The total energy of the ball when it reaches the bottom of the ramp = m g h. The angular kinetic energy = friction force times distance rolled, and linear kinetic energy = total energy - angular kinetic energy. You didn't describe how you determined the friction force, which equals the angular acceleration x angular inertia / radius of ball. Angular acceleration equals linear acceleration / radius. Linear acceleration = g sin(θ) - (friction force / m). This is enough information to solve for acceleration and friction force based on θ and the angular inertia of the ball.
 
joe5185 said:
Does this friction force remove energy from the ball?
no friction does not change the total kinetic energy (linear + rotational) of ball
joe5185 said:
Was I wrong to do this and if so why (my teacher said it was wrong but couldn't say why uggh)?
yes you were wrong
static friction will act but net work done by static friction on body =0
since linear work = (-1)*rotational work
since (force . linear displacement) = (-1) * ( torque . angular displacement ) (. denotes scalar product operator)
so net work by friction (linear work + rotational work) = 0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
945
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K