Band Theory of Solids, Kittel CH 7

KaiserSose`
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I feel like I have a pretty good conceptual understanding of the origin of band theory, but these two problems were totally above my head.

Kittel Ch7 #2

Consider the free electron bands of an fcc crystal lattice in the approximation of an empty lattice, but in the reduced zone scheme in which all k's are transformed to lie in the first Brillouin zone. Plot roughly in the [111] direction the energies of all bands up to six times the lowest band energy at the zone boundary at k=2\pi/a(1/2,1/2,1/2). Let this be the unit of energy. This problem shows why band edges need not necessarily be at the zone center. Several degeneracies will be removed when account is taken of the crystal potential.


Homework Equations


Wish I knew.


The Attempt at a Solution


Like I said, totally baffled.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

I realized that we're both concerned with the same problem in Kittel's book.
I'm not sure you're still interested, since your post dates back several months.
In case you are, you can have a look at this post.

I'm almost sure my last comment is the correct answer, but I'll appreciate some feedback.

Cheers

Franz
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top