Barriers & Tunneling: Find No Reflection & Max. Reflection Thresholds

  • Thread starter Thread starter zbhest123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tunneling
zbhest123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Let 11.0-eV electrons approach a potential barrier of height 3.8 eV.
2. (a) For what barrier thickness is there no reflection? (b) For what barrier thickness is the reflection a maximum?
3. For part (a) I tried using kL=npi where k=sqrt(2m(E-V))/hbar, because this is where the Probability of transmission T=1.
The equation for probability of transmission is given by T=(1+V^2sin^2(kL)/(4E(E-V)))^-1. V is the potential barrier, 3.8 eV
I solved for L, getting: L=npi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)), but I still don't know n. (n is an integer) And when ignoring n I get the wrong answer.
The answer I get is 7.623e-19.
The answer in the book is L=.229nm or any integer multiple thereof.
I have no idea what to do from here, I also multiplied the top and the bottom by c=3e8 due to electron mass m=.511e6 eV/c^2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zbhest123 said:
I solved for L, getting: L=npi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)), but I still don't know n. (n is an integer) And when ignoring n I get the wrong answer.

n is just any integer, because if pi*hbar/sqrt(2m(E-V)) satisfies the equation sin(k1*L)=0, so do all of its integer multiples.

The answer I get is 7.623e-19.
The answer in the book is L=.229nm or any integer multiple thereof.
[/b]

Check over your algebra. Did you remember to convert E and V to joules?
 
Nevermind! I got it using the equation: T=(1+V^2sin^2(kL)/(4E(E-V)))^-1

Simplifying to sin^2(kL)=0

Originally I put it in my calculator to find arcsin(0) equal to 0. It was then pointed out to me that it can also equal pi. So I used Lk=pi, simplified to L=pi/k, which gave me a correct answer.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top