Engineering Basic Circuit Analysis - mutual induc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a circuit analysis problem involving mutual inductance, where the user struggles to arrive at the correct answer of V0 = 2.24 at an angle of -153.43. Participants suggest that the user may have incorrectly mixed the inductance values in their calculations, specifically regarding the mutual inductance term. It is clarified that using a mutual inductance of 2j instead of j leads to the correct answer, prompting questions about the definition and context of M in the problem. The conversation also touches on the dependence of mutual inductance on the coupling coefficient and the correct notation for angular frequency. Overall, the confusion stems from the interpretation of mutual inductance values in the equations used.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
This problem seems so simple, but I CANNOT get the right answer.Here is the work I've done so far:
159576165_67e300b767.jpg


I've also attached the work, but if anyone wants to check the links before it gets approved, please be my guest.

The books says that the correct answer is:

V0 = 2.24 at an angle of -153.43

I don't understand what I'm doing wrong !
 

Attachments

  • homework.jpg
    homework.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 535
Physics news on Phys.org
Not exactly the most helpful tip, but you will get the answer in the book (according to the method you used) if the mutual inductance is 2j instead of j.
 
I think you mixed the inductance in your equations. I agree with doodle, if you use j2 you'll get the answer in the back of the book.
 
Why would the mutual inductance term be 2j?

Isn't M defined by as j1\omega ?

If I use 2j I get the book's answer, but I don't understand why I should use 2j.
 
I am not sure why you should say that M is defined as j1w. Or perhaps you are trying to say that the question explicitly gave M = j1w?

A quick browse in my Circuit Theory textbook reveals that M depends on the coupling coefficient, k, and then M = k sqrt(L1*L2).
 
Oh sorry about the latex confusion. Yes, the question explicitly said that M = j1\Omega

I typed a small omega instead of a big one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top