Basic commutator of angular momentum

catsarebad
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Could someone explain to me how the author goes from 2nd to 3rd step

img1750.png

I think the intermediate step between 2 and 3 is basically to split up the commutator as

[y p_z, z p_x] - [y p_z,x p_z] - [z p_y,z p_x] + [z p_y, x p_z]

2nd term = 0
3rd term = 0

so leftover is
[L_x, L_y] = [y p_z, z p_x] + [z p_y, x p_z]

but how does this turn into what he has on 3rd step?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
catsarebad said:
[...]
so leftover is
[L_x, L_y] = [y p_z, z p_x] + [z p_y, x p_z]

but how does this turn into what he has on 3rd step?
Multiple applications of the Leibniz product rule: ##[AB,C] = A[B,C] + [A,C]B##
 
really? I thought it would be much simpler than that. I thought i was missing a trivial trick.
 
catsarebad said:
really? I thought it would be much simpler than that. I thought i was missing a trivial trick.
Once you become proficient with the Leibniz rule, you'll be able to skip steps. E.g., the ##y## in the 1st commutator commutes with ##zp_x##, so it can just be taken out the front, and so on. You could call that a "trivial" trick, but it's wise to carefully practice the Leibniz rule a few times initially, since it's essential when simplifying more difficult commutators.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top