[Basic QM] Potential step & particle flow, my answer is inconsistent ?

Nick89
Messages
553
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A flow of particles collides with a potential step. The potential is zero for x < 0 and a certain value V_0 for x > 0.
The flow of particles comes in from the left (x<0 area).

One of the questions is to give the general form of the wavefunction in the area x > 0 and to find an expression for the wavenumber k.

Homework Equations


-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} + V_0 \psi = E \psi
(For x > 0)

The Attempt at a Solution



I first write the schrodinger eq. into a more general form:
-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} + (V_0 - E) \psi = 0
- \frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} + \frac{2m (V_0-E)}{\hbar^2} \psi = 0
\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} - \frac{2m (V_0-E)}{\hbar^2} \psi = 0
\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} - k^2 \psi = 0

So
k^2 = \frac{2m (V_0-E)}{\hbar^2}

And the solution are complex exponents due to the minus-sign (they would be real exponents if it was a plus sign):
\psi (x) = A e^{ikx} + B e^{-ikx}Now, when I look at the answer, I noticed that they also use complex exponents, but their k was different:
k^2 = \frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar^2}
(E-V instead of V-E)

This is a pretty important error because:

In my case: If E > V, the particle is 'above the potential step' and thus it should be a complex exp. (sin/cos). But, if E > V then k becomes complex, and the exponents become real!
If E < V, the particle is 'inside the potential step' and thus it should be a real exponent (as usual with penetration in classically forbidden area). But, if E < V then k is real and the exponents stay complex!...

Obviously I made an error with a minus sign somewhere, but I honestly can't find it..!?I also tried switching the minus sign for a plus sign (and swapping the E and V again obviously) to get:
\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} + \frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar^2} \psi = 0
So now, my k is in accordance with the answer (E-V), but because of the + I get REAL exponents, and if E > V, k is real and the exponents stay real (wrong), and if E < V, k is complex and the exponents become complex (wrong)...?

I can't figure it out...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nick89 said:
...
\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} - k^2 \psi = 0

So
k^2 = \frac{2m (V_0-E)}{\hbar^2}

And the solution are complex exponents due to the minus-sign (they would be real exponents if it was a plus sign):
\psi (x) = A e^{ikx} + B e^{-ikx}


This is where things went backwards. The solution to
\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} = k^2 \psi
is
\psi (x) = A e^{kx} + B e^{-kx}
with no i in the exponents. In order to get the other form we should define
k^2 = \frac{2m (E-V_0)}{\hbar^2}
so that
\frac{d^2 \psi}{dx^2} = -k^2 \psi.

This is the answer "they" get (and has the right behavior for E &gt; V_0, E &lt; V_0), but you can easily check the signs just by substituting \psi back into the differential equation.
 
Omg... You're completely right of course. I checked and re-checked that, and I was actually under the impression that the solution to
y&#039;&#039; - k^2y = 0
had complex exponents and the solution to
y&#039;&#039; + k^2y = 0
had real exponents... It's the other way around of course. Can't believe I mixed them up, must have been the holidays hehe...
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top