Beginners Guide to Probability & Statistics: Examples & Applications

BrunoIdeas
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What book or course would you recommend to a beginner in Probability and Statistics?
That is my question. However I would like to specify my intentions.
Along my math courses I have observed (many people have) that mathematicians have a different way of thinking this common language, mathematics, so is their focus. So I would like a book/course which has applications and really good, non trivial, examples. I found this a key point, GOOD EXAMPLES, not just the case for zero which obvsiously verifies everey property or the empty set. Examples that have to do either with everyday life or with applications.

Thanks in advance to everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


BrunoIdeas said:
What book or course would you recommend to a beginner in Probability and Statistics?
That is my question. However I would like to specify my intentions.
Along my math courses I have observed (many people have) that mathematicians have a different way of thinking this common language, mathematics, so is their focus. So I would like a book/course which has applications and really good, non trivial, examples. I found this a key point, GOOD EXAMPLES, not just the case for zero which obvsiously verifies everey property or the empty set. Examples that have to do either with everyday life or with applications.

Thanks in advance to everyone.

Hey there BrunoIdeas and welcome to the forums.

Most of the standard introductory A level probability books do focus on applications.

My university used Mathematical Statistics with Applications and it has a lot of problems which should keep you busy.

Get some of the actuary exams of the respective professional websites: that should keep you busy and give you a few headaches.
 


chiro said:
My university used Mathematical Statistics with Applications and it has a lot of problems which should keep you busy.

Can you remember the author(s)? They're often a more distinctive way of identifying such books. The first page of Google results I got contained 3 of that title. But the blurb here at Amazon.com says the one by Wackerly, Mendenhall & Scheaffer is a popular choice at US universities.
 


For basic probability theory with lots of examples and fun problems, I really like "a first course in probability" by Ross. Your college library likely has it. If you want to buy it, get a used copy of an old edition for cheap. I learned from the third edition which I thought was quite excellent - am not familiar with other editions by I suspect they are similar. Does not contain statistics, but you need to know probability before you can do statistics, so it is a good place to start.

good luck,

jason
 


I really enjoy "understanding probability" by Henk Tijms. The book is literally filled with cool, nontrivial examples :approve:
 


Rasalhague said:
Can you remember the author(s)? They're often a more distinctive way of identifying such books. The first page of Google results I got contained 3 of that title. But the blurb here at Amazon.com says the one by Wackerly, Mendenhall & Scheaffer is a popular choice at US universities.

That's the one.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top