What is the recommended maximum deflection for a bicycle frame test using FEA?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the maximum allowable deflection for a bicycle frame tested using FEA in ABAQUS, with a suggested static load of 4G*120kg. Initial estimates for maximum vertical deflection range from 0.15 mm to 1.5 mm, with a specific recommendation of 1.5 mm as a starting point. Participants suggest comparing results from known stiff and flexible frames to establish appropriate deflection bounds. There is a call for input from experts to validate or adjust these deflection criteria based on actual test outcomes. Establishing these parameters is crucial for ensuring the structural integrity and performance of the bicycle frame.
An1MuS
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a group project where we test a bicycle frame on ABAQUS.

The test is as follow

mEy4ro1.jpg


Where F is a static load. It was suggested for us to consider it as 4G*120kg to simulate a laboratory test. We're having a hard time knowing what is the maximum deflection (or stifness) we should allow.

I can't find any tests like this, or websites where i could get that information. Does anyone have any idea?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Google 'bicycle frame analysis' and you will get many suggestions and references.
 
I did and i won't get any of use for this case, but thanks for the suggestion. :)
 
An1MuS: I currently would guess the vertical deflection in your above frame test will be quite low, perhaps less than 2 mm. I currently would guess, initially use 1.5 mm as your current maximum allowable vertical deflection criterion, and see how it goes. My current guess for the range of good values would be 0.15 to 1.5 mm (?). I.e., in this current guess, the maximum allowable vertical deflection would be ymax = 1.5 mm.

And then if someone with expertise in this particular vertical deflection load case sees this thread, then they could advise whether my guessed maximum allowable vertical deflection value (ymax), or allowable deflection range, should be modified.

How would the 1.5 mm criterion, or the proposed range I stated above (0.15 to 1.5 mm), compare to some of your current deflection results? Also, you could, e.g., make your frame like a good, existing frame, and then see what vertical deflection value you obtain. And then post the results, so we can start comparing it to the proposed deflection criterion, to see if we are in the correct ball park. Do this for a good, known, stiff frame, to establish the lower allowable deflection (ymin) bound. Then do it again for a good, known, very flexible frame, to establish the upper allowable deflection (ymax) bound.
 
Last edited:
http://www.justinreina.com/portfolio/ME%20354%20-%20Bicycle%20lab.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top