Bicycle Wheel Friction: Average Torque Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the average torque due to friction for a bicycle wheel with a radius of 0.330 m and mass of 2.00 kg, which stops after 48 seconds. The initial calculation used the moment of inertia formula for a solid disk, leading to an incorrect torque value. It was pointed out that the wheel behaves like a thin hoop, requiring the use of the moment of inertia formula I = mr^2 instead. After correcting the formula, the participant successfully recalculated the torque. The importance of accurately determining the moment of inertia based on mass distribution is emphasized in the context of rotational motion.
kbyws37
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
A bicycle wheel, of radius 0.330 m and mass 2.00 kg (concentrated on the rim), is rotating at 4.12 rev/s. After 48.0 s the wheel comes to a stop because of friction. What is the magnitude of the average torque due to frictional forces?

First I did
I = (1/2)(mr^2) = (1/2)(2kg)(0.330^2 m) = 0.1089 kg m^2

Then i used the equation
Torque = I*alpha = (I)(omega)/(time)
=((0.1089 kg m^2)(4.12 rev/s x 2pi rad/rev))/(48 s)
=0.0587 N m

however i am getting this question wrong. what am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
just a quick thought that your methods seem to be assuming that the torque force is changing linearly with respect to time. My quick thought says that probably isn't right (usually fiction effects are thought to be proportional to velocity, and probably that isn't linear with respect to time. Does this help you think about the problem differently?
 
sorry, i still don't get it.
i don't know where else i would put time in
 
kbyws37 said:
sorry, i still don't get it.
i don't know where else i would put time in
Try using I as mr^2, not mr^2/2. The rotational Inertia of a thin hoop is mr^2, which is the case here since all the mass is concentrated along the rim..
 
thank you so much! i got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top