Black Hole Mass, Rotation & Matter: Explained

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, specifically addressing their mass, rotation, and the acquisition of material, while grappling with the concept of singularities as finite points. Participants explore the theoretical implications and challenges posed by these phenomena, touching on both general relativity and quantum theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how black holes can have different masses and rotate if they are finite points, expressing confusion about the nature of mass and matter in black holes.
  • Another participant suggests that the point-like nature of black hole singularities is uncertain, proposing a hypothetical scenario of mass compressed to an extremely small volume.
  • A third participant acknowledges the complexity of the question, noting that the intersection of general relativity and quantum theory at singularities remains poorly understood, with ongoing attempts to develop a theory of quantum gravity.
  • Another perspective is introduced referencing Kip Thorne's work, which discusses a theorem by Roger Penrose that suggests any star collapsing to form a black hole must contain a singularity, indicating a limit to spacetime and the destruction of anything that reaches it.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of black holes and singularities, indicating that there is no consensus on the exact nature of these phenomena or how they reconcile with existing theories.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of current theories in fully describing singularities and the potential contradictions in existing models, emphasizing the need for further exploration in the field of quantum gravity.

Randi88
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This may be pretty basic but how can black holes have different masses, rotate, obtain material or have mass if black holes are finite points. I'm sure it has something to do with mathematics or theory but it is difficult for me to make any sense of this. Black holes make sense to me until I factor in that they are supposed to be a finite point. Even the fact that they attain mass and matter is confusing. They are a finite spot that can be accessed at all points, 3 dimensions, so where does the matter go?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We don't really know whether black hole singularities are pointlike. Would it bother you to have ten solar masses compressed to, say, [itex]10^{-105}[/itex] cubic meters (one cubic Planck length)?
 
This may be pretty basic but how can black holes have different masses, rotate, obtain material or have mass if black holes are finite points.

It IS basic, a fundamental unknown. but not simple. And that is one major reason black holes are so fascinating to theorists. Immense gravity, best described by general relativity, and the physics of the small, best described by quantum theory, come together at the singularities. But so far neither theory can handle the exact description of whatever that "singularity" may be. Quantum gravity is an attempt at such descriptions, not yet fulfilled.

More here, but I think many here would disagree with some of the description:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#Singularity

Note that the words don't say "finite points"...it's a subtle distinction.

And within in the description are contradictions ...
It can also be shown that the singular region contains all the mass of the black hole solution...
versus

It is generally expected that a theory of quantum gravity will feature black holes without singularities,,,

So we have more to learn.
 
Another perspective in answering the OP question.

I was just reading a section of Black Holes and Time Warps, by Kip Thorne and on page 463 he discusses an interesting feature of black holes discovered by Roger Penrose:

The (singulairty) theorem says, roughly, that any star which implodes to form an apparent horizon must have a singularity inside. ..and was derived from topology...

The theorem simply told us that somewhere inside a black hole, spacetime must come to an end, and anything that reaches that end must be destroyed. HOW it gets destroyed was the province of curvature, THAT it gets destroyed...that there is an end to spacetime...was the province of topology.

That "end" is the singularity. How spacetime gets destroyed there is unknown.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K