Block on slope. Different answers using energy vs forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of a block on a slope interacting with a spring, contrasting energy methods with force equilibrium. The correct approach involves recognizing that the block undergoes simple harmonic motion, and the equilibrium position is found at half the maximum compression of the spring. The derived equations confirm that the equilibrium compression distance, \( x_{eq} \), is given by \( x_{eq} = \frac{mg\sin\theta}{k} \), aligning with the force balance method. Misapplication of energy conservation principles led to confusion regarding the relationship between kinetic and potential energy during the motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium and forces acting on a block.
  • Familiarity with simple harmonic motion and its characteristics.
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in mechanical systems.
  • Basic proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations involving kinetic and potential energy.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of simple harmonic motion in detail.
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems, focusing on potential and kinetic energy transformations.
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of force equilibrium in spring-mass systems.
  • Investigate the effects of different angles on the equilibrium position of blocks on slopes.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of dynamics involving springs and inclined planes.

laser
Messages
104
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
(b) A stone weighing 160 N is resting on a spring at the bottom of a ramp which is inclined at θ=50 to the horizontal. The spring constant is 7000 N m^-1. How much is the spring compressed by the block?
Relevant Equations
F = ma
F = kx
E = mgh
E = 1/2kx^2
1702295666026.png


The first equation is when I use forces. The block is in static equilibrium, therefore the spring force should balance the gravitational force.

The second equation is when I use energy principles. Energy before compression = Energy at compression. The height before is x * sintheta, and the height after is 0 (defining my zero potential to be at max compression). Why do I get different answers?

1702295898542.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your energy method is wrong. If you released a block from rest where the spring elongation is zero, it would start undergoing simple harmonic motion around the equilibrium point. Your requirement that the change in gravitational potential should equal the change in potential energy of the spring is the same as requiring the mass to be at rest - which it will momentarily be at the turning point - then it will go back up. The equilibrium point that is being asked for is in the middle between the turning points - accounting exactly for the factor of two.

TLDR; Your energy method is not applicable to this case as it assumes something which is not true.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu, MatinSAR and laser
Another way of seeing it: You are looking for the minimum of the total potential energy, not for where the potential energy is the same as when the spring is unloaded.
 
The difference is the kinetic energy that you get if you release it from rest, or the work you have to do to lower it gradually.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR, Lnewqban and laser
Examine a vertical spring where you simply release the mass allowing it to fall into the spring using energy conservation. When the mass fully compresses the spring it has instantaneously zero velocity like your energy equation suggest, but then ask yourself what happens next? Compare the two scenarios.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and laser
Mechanical energy conservation works but you applied it incorrectly. You stated mechanical energy conservation as
laser said:
Energy before compression = Energy at compression.
which can be misleading. A preferred way to write it is in terms of energy changes, $$\Delta K+\Delta U$$ between a starting point A and an ending point B. Here, you want to find the distance by which the spring is compressed when the mass is at equilibrium. Call that distance ##x=x_{eq}##.

Suppose you release the block from rest at point A which is the relaxed position of the spring. The block will descend acquiring kinetic energy at the expense of potential energy until it reaches ##x_{eq}.## However, it will not stop there because at the equilibrium point the acceleration is zero but not the speed. At the equilibrium point the mass has acquired maximum kinetic energy ##K_{max}##. It is maximum because past that point, the acceleration changes direction and the speed and kinetic energy decrease.

Now all forces are conservative. Therefore, if the mass gains kinetic energy ##K_{max}## after descending distance ##x_{eq}## when the acceleration is in the same direction, it will need to descend an additional distance ##x_{eq}## when the acceleration is reversed in order to lose ##K_{max}## and reach maximum compression at ##x=x_{max}.## Thus, $$x_{max}=2x_{eq}.$$ Now we write the energy conservation equation from point of release A to point of maximum compression B, $$\begin{align} & \Delta K+\Delta U_{\text{spring}}+\Delta U_{\text{grav.}}=0 \nonumber \\
& (0-0)+\left(\frac{1}{2}kx_{max}^2-0\right)+(0-mgx_{max}\sin\theta)=0 \nonumber \\
&\frac{1}{2}kx_{max}^2=mgx_{max}\sin\theta \implies x_{max}=\frac{2mg\sin\theta}{k}. \nonumber \\
\end{align}.$$ We have seen that ##x_{max}=2x_{eq}.## Therefore, $$x_{eq}=\frac{mg\sin\theta}{k}$$ which is what one gets using the force equilibrium argument.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K