What is the distance at which the bobsled will come to a halt?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance at which a bobsled will come to a halt after descending a hill. The bobsled starts from rest at point A and travels through a frictionless section before encountering a kinetic friction coefficient of 0.4 between points D and E. Participants emphasize the conservation of energy principle, noting that the total energy remains constant between points A and D due to negligible friction. The challenge lies in determining the bobsled's final speed at point D, which is influenced by the heights of the hills but does not affect the speed at point D itself. Understanding these energy dynamics is crucial for calculating the stopping distance beyond point D.
mikefitz
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
http://img76.imageshack.us/img76/6271/pichp1.gif

A bobsled run leads down a hill as sketched in the figure above. Between points A and D, friction is negligible. Between points D and E at the end of the run, the coefficient of kinetic friction is µk = 0.4. The mass of the bobsled with drivers is 210 kg and it starts from rest at point A.

Find the distance x beyond point D at which the bobsled will come to a halt.


I'm thinking the best way to approach this problem is by calculating the final speed of the bobsled (bottom of the 2nd hill) and using the mass and µk to come up with the distance.

I'm having trouble visualizing how to come up with the final speed, however. The second hill is 30m high, but the initial speed down the hill will not be 0 due to the speed the bobsled gains from the first 50m hill. Where should I begin? Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Since there's no friction between A and D, what is conserved?
 
So, since the external forces are 0 then total energy does not change from one place to the next.

energy at top = energy at bottom

But how do the 50m and 30m heights effect the speed of the sled? or do they? thanks again
 
mikefitz said:
So, since the external forces are 0 then total energy does not change from one place to the next.

energy at top = energy at bottom
Since dissipative forces are zero, the total energy is conserved.

But how do the 50m and 30m heights effect the speed of the sled? or do they?
They certainly affect the speed of the sled as it goes over those hills, but no energy is lost. Those hills don't affect the speed at D.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top