Boltzmann Distribution: Mean Energy & Mean Square Energy

Berko
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Compute the mean energy and mean square energy of a free particle using the Boltzmann distribution.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I calculated the mean energy to be 3/2 kT by computing the mean square velocity directly from the Boltmann distribution function and then multiplying it by 1/2 m and then again multiplying by 3 to get the answer in three dimensions.

However, I cannot figure out how to compute the mean square energy as E^2 is proportional v^4 and computing it in one dimension does not allow me to simply multiply by 3 to get the answer in 3 dimensions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just tried <E^2> = <(Ex+Ey+Ez)^2> = 9<Ex^2> since <Ex>=<Ey>=<Ez> and each of the three components are independent of the others.

My result was <E^2> = 27/8 k^2 T^2.

Does this make sense?
 
Last edited:
No. Why 9 and not 3 ?
 
bigubau said:
No. Why 9 and not 3 ?



Cross terms. (x+y+z)^2 = x^2+y^2+z^2 +2xz +2xy +2yz
 
Hmm, you're right. Your answer should be fine then.
 
Well, I just recalculated.

<E^2> = <(x+y+z)^2> = <x^2+y^2+z^2+2xy+2xz+2yz> = 3<x^2> + 6<x><x> = 3<x^2> + 6<x>^2

where I used x for Ex and so on.

So, now my answer for <E^2> is 21/8 k^2 T^2
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top