Braking Distance Increase Factor w/ 50% Speed Increase

  • Thread starter Thread starter sugarntwiligh
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Increasing a car's speed by 50% results in a minimum braking distance increase factor of 2.25, assuming all other conditions remain constant. The discussion revolves around deriving this factor using kinetic energy equations. By expressing the relationship between initial and final speeds mathematically, participants clarify how kinetic energy changes with speed. The key takeaway is that the braking distance is proportional to the square of the speed increase. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the physics of braking distances.
sugarntwiligh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the speed of a car is increased by 50%, by what factor will its minimum braking distance be increased, assuming all else is the same? Ignore the driver's reaction time.

Homework Equations




.5(2m)(v1+5.0)^2 = .5m(v2+5.0)^2

I know the answer is 2.25 and is deduced from the above equation. I tried to simplify:

v1^2+10v1+25 = .5v2^2+5v2+12.5

but I am still confused. I know I should eliminate time as a variable, but I am unsure of how to do this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sugarntwiligh said:
.5(2m)(v1+5.0)^2 = .5m(v2+5.0)^2
I don't understand what this equation represents.

Try this:

KE_1 = 1/2 m (v_1)^2

KE_2 = 1/2 m (v_2)^2

If v_2 is 50% greater than v_1 (express that mathematically), how does KE_2 compare with KE_1?
 
So,
(v_1) = (v_2) + (v_2 * 0.5) = 1.5 (v_2)
and, if I substitute KE_1 and KE_2 into the equation,
I get KE_1=2.25KE_2.
OMG THANK YOU!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top