Engineering Bridge/Ladder Circuit and Node Voltage Method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of the Node Voltage Method to bridge/ladder circuits, with the user expressing uncertainty about their approach due to a lack of examples from their professor. They have attempted to verify their results using Ohm's Law but question whether this method guarantees correctness, as it only confirms that currents sum to zero. A suggestion is made to use Kirchhoff's Laws for additional verification, emphasizing that passing the Ohm's Law test does not necessarily validate the values obtained. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing bridge/ladder circuits and the importance of thorough checking methods. Ultimately, the user seeks clarity on the reliability of their results and the validity of their approach.
Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2016-09-04 at 3.24.28 PM.png


Homework Equations


Node Voltage Method
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


So I have never worked with a bridge/ladder circuit before and I am not sure if I am doing it correctly. My professor never gave us an example of a bridge/ladder so I'm kinda winging it. Anyway can I apply node voltage method to this circuit just like any other? I tried doing that, but I got some weird answers, so I don't know if it is correct. Did I make some small mistake in my equations? Or are my equations completely wrong?

New Doc 19.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcin H said:
I tried doing that, but I got some weird answers, so I don't know if it is correct. Did I make some small mistake in my equations? Or are my equations completely wrong?
Just check the result by means of Ohm's law:

Currents toward V1 =

( 2V - 28/19 V ) / 2kΩ
- 28/19 V / 8kΩ
- 6/19 V / 4 kΩ = ( must be zero )

Same check with V2
 
Hesch said:
Just check the result by means of Ohm's law:

Currents toward V1 =

( 2V - 28/19 V ) / 2kΩ
- 28/19 V / 8kΩ
- 6/19 V / 4 kΩ = ( must be zero )

Same check with V2
It works with Ohms law, but does that mean that it's correct? It feels like this way of checking will always give you the right answer? So just because they add up to 0 doesn't make them the correct values is what I am getting at. Or is this not right?
 
A good tactic I use is to check with the Kirchoff's law that you didn't use for the solution. If you use KCL to solve it, use KVL to check it.
 
Marcin H said:
So just because they add up to 0 doesn't make them the correct values is what I am getting at. Or is this not right?
Show me an incorrect result that will be accepted as correct by means of the "Ohm's law test".

Your circuit is not a bistable or "multistable" circuit.
 
  • Like
Likes Marcin H
Back
Top