Bullet hits wood block, slides, hits ideal spring: cons. of energy/momentum

AI Thread Summary
A bullet embeds itself in a wooden block, which then slides and compresses a spring, prompting a discussion on energy and momentum conservation. The initial kinetic energy of the bullet is not fully transferred to the block due to energy losses from heat and sound. The user is attempting to derive the mass of the block using conservation equations but struggles with algebraic manipulation. They have calculated a mass of 1.3 kg for the block but are advised to verify this by substituting back into the quadratic equation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for energy losses and checking calculations for accuracy.
strangeeyes
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 50g bullet traveling horizontally at 200 m/s embeds itself in a much more massive wooden block initially at rest on a horizontal surface ( \muk = 0.10). The block then slides 1.2 m toward an ideal spring and collides with it. The block compresses the spring (k=600.0 N/m) a maximum of 20.0 cm. Calculate the mass of the block of wood.

let (b) represent the bullet and (w) the wood block:
Mb=0.05 kg
Vb=200 m/s
Vw=0 m/s
\muk =0.10
\Deltad=1.2 m(+ 0.2 m)?
k=600 N/m
x=0.2m
Mw=?
Vw+b'=?

My thinking is that the initial energy of the bullet does not equal the final energy of the system because the bullet would lose energy when it hits the block (through heat, sound etc).

to find an equation to substitute for Vw+b:
MwVw+MbVb=(Mw+Mb)Vw+b
Mw0 + 0.05(200)=(Mw+ 0.05)Vw+b
Vw+b= 10/(Mw + 0.05)

now to put that into the conservation of energy equation:
Et=Et'
Ek=Eth+Ee
0.5Mw+b(Vw+b)2= \muk(Fn)\Deltad + 0.5kx2
0.5(0.05+Mw)(10/Mw+0.05)2=0.1[9.8(0.05+Mw)]1.2+0.5(600)0.22

can someone tell me if I'm on the right path? i have no clue how to complete the left side algebraically, so it'd be nice to know
if it is even a necessary effort...

also i don't know if the displacement should include the 20 cm the block travels after hitting the spring because at that point it's not just friction acting against the block
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you're on the right track. Your final expression will resolve into a quadratic equation which you'll have to solve to find the mass. I'd suggest moving everything to one side of the "=" and expanding it out, multiplying out all the arithmetic operations you can to reduce the confusion.
 
thanks, i think I've figured it out. i got Mw=1.3 kg

also, i doubt you remember this, but you were helping me with an explosion question i was having trouble with

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=456273

i got an answer but it's wrong. your help would be greatly greatly appreciated; this problem is driving me mad!
 
strangeeyes said:
thanks, i think I've figured it out. i got Mw=1.3 kg
You might want to check that answer (plug the value back into the quadratic and see if it produces zero). This particular quadratic has two real roots; one positive and one negative.

also, i doubt you remember this, but you were helping me with an explosion question i was having trouble with

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=456273

i got an answer but it's wrong. your help would be greatly greatly appreciated; this problem is driving me mad!

I'll have a look.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top