Calculate Acceleration of Falling Hammer on Moon | 1-D Kinematics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter RubenL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
An astronaut drops a hammer on the Moon, which falls 6.0 meters in 2.7 seconds, leading to a calculated acceleration of 1.62 m/s² using the kinematics equation x = x0 + v0t + (1/2)at². The discussion focuses on understanding the origin of the 1/2 in the equation, which comes from calculus and the integration of motion equations. The derivation involves separating variables and integrating, resulting in the term (1/2)at², which accounts for the changing velocity during the object's fall. Participants emphasize the importance of calculus for grasping the underlying principles of kinematics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
RubenL
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An astronaut standing on a platform on the Moon
drops a hammer. If the hammer falls 6.0 meters vertically in 2.7 seconds, what is its acceleration?

Homework Equations



x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2

The Attempt at a Solution



x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2
6=0+.5(a)(2.72)
6=3.7a
a=1.62m/s2

This is a very simple question and easily solvable...however my question is...considering this kinematics equation x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2.
I can understand how all of the variables play within this equation, but i do not understand where the 1/2 comes from (i understand it has to be this way, however), what is the purpose of halving you answer?

(this is wrong, but) why can't the equation be solved like so;

X=6m
Vi=0m/s
t=2.7s
a=?m/s2

6m / 2.7s = 2.2m/s
2.2m/s / 2.7s = .81m/s2

and leave it like so? (like i said i know this is wrong, but i am just trying to figure out why the 1/2 is in the equation)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Im not very good at typing in the formulas. But the 1/2 comes from the derivation of the expression you are using, and the properties of calculus.

x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

is derived from v=dx/dt, separate the dx and dt (v*dt=dx) and integrate both sides. You can subsitute v for (vo +at), since you velocity at any time is equal to your initial velocity + your accel*time.

so you now are integrating both sides of dx = (vo +at)dt. When you integrate the second term on the right "a*t", a is constant, so you can pull it out of the integral, then integrate t*dt, which is 1/2*t2. the first term on the right side integrates to vo*t

this whole integral gives you x=vot +1/2at2 +C

When t=0, you find C=xo

so the final expression you are using is x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

hopefully that helps
 
Last edited:
climb515c said:
Im not very good at typing in the formulas. But the 1/2 comes from the derivation of the expression you are using, and the properties of calculus.

x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

is derived from v=dx/dt, separate the dx and dt (v*dt=dx) and integrate both sides. You can subsitute v for (vo +at), since you velocity at any time is equal to your initial velocity + your accel*time.

so you now are integrating both sides of dx = (vo +at)dt. When you integrate the second term on the right "a*t", a is constant, so you can pull it out of the integral, then integrate t*dt, which is 1/2*t2. the first term on the right side integrates to vo*t

this whole integral gives you x=vot +1/2at2 +C

When t=0, you find C=xo

so the final expression you are using is x=xo+Vot +1/2at2

hopefully that helps

Great! This helps put reason to it. I see i need to get my head into calculus to fully understand. But its clear to me now that there is a mathematical reason behind it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top