Calculate Body Heat Loss & Time to Compensate with Help from Physics Experts

  • Thread starter Thread starter mlee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating body heat loss for a skier using physics principles. The skier's body heat loss through dry clothing is calculated at 1830 watts, while the loss through wet clothing increases significantly to 22875 watts due to higher thermal conductivity. To compensate for the heat lost, the skier can consume a 200-calorie candy bar, with calculations needed to determine how long she must sit outside to offset this energy loss. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unit conversion and applying Fourier's Law for accurate results. Participants are encouraged to verify calculations and engage further once initial questions are addressed.
mlee
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Dear people,

Who can help me with this physics problem?

A skier is sitting on top of the mountain on a windless day. The sky is cloudy and the principal loss of her body heat is due to conduction. Her body temperature is 33 degrees of celsius and the air temperature at the surface of her clothes is one degrees of celsius. Her weight is 60kg, her body surface area is 1.8m^2 and the thickness of her ski clothes is 1.2 cm. The thermal conductivity of her ski clothing is 0.040 W/(mK)

Question a:
Calculate the rate (in watts) at which body heat flows out through her clothing?

Question b:
How would this rate change if, after a fall, her clothes became totally wet so that the thermal conductivity of her ski clothing became comparable to that of water, that is, 0.5 W/(mK)

Question c:
To compensate for her loss of heat, the skier eats a candy bar which has 200 calories. How many minutes must she sit outside to compensate for the candy bar if her clothes are dry? How many minutes if her clothes are wet?

thanxxx!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
About the two first a) and b) you have all the parameters needed for the Fourier's Law. You only have to substitute them inside the formula.

When you have done a) and b) we'll talk again. :smile:
 
a) Q= kA(T_H-T_L)/h, where k=0.040W/(mK),A= 1.8m^2, h=1.2x10^-2m, T_H= 33, T_L=1
Q= 1830 Watts

b) Q= 22875 Watts

IS this right>??
 
It seems to be right. But check your answer if you have a solution. I'm not going to switch on the calculator. I'm a bit lazy.¡

For question c), the simplest solution I see is the conservation of the flux rate:

\frac{dQ}{dt}=1830W=\frac{200cal}{t}

work out t and tell me what happens. Be careful with the units and converse it to joules.
 
thank you very much
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top