Calculate Dielectric Thickness for 100pF Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kev1n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thickness
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the dielectric thickness for a 100pF capacitor with plates measuring 5mm x 10mm and a relative permittivity of 12, the formula d = eA/C is used. The area of the plates is calculated as 0.05 m². Initial calculations yielded an incorrect value of 6,000,000, prompting a reevaluation. The correct approach involves using d = Eo x Er x A / C, resulting in a thickness of approximately 0.0513mm. Accurate dielectric thickness is crucial for achieving the desired capacitance.
Kev1n
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
1.
A capacitor is formed by 2 parallel plates separated by a dielectric of relative permattivity er = 12, the capacitor plates are 5mm x 10mm. Calculate the thickness of the dielectric required to create a capacitor of 100pF




2. C = eA / d therefore d=eA/C, we have C 100 x 10-9, area of pates 5x10-3 x 10x10-3 = 50x10-3mm2 (0.05m2



3. C = eA / D = 12 x 0.05 / 100 x 10-9
= 6000000
This is a massive figure so I am guessing incorrect any pointers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kev1n said:
1.
A capacitor is formed by 2 parallel plates separated by a dielectric of relative permattivity er = 12, the capacitor plates are 5mm x 10mm. Calculate the thickness of the dielectric required to create a capacitor of 100pF




2. C = eA / d therefore d=eA/C, we have C 100 x 10-9, area of pates 5x10-3 x 10x10-3 = 50x10-3mm2 (0.05m2



3. C = eA / D = 12 x 0.05 / 100 x 10-9
= 6000000
This is a massive figure so I am guessing incorrect any pointers


Should I have used d = Eo x Er x A / C

12 x 8.85x10-12 x 50 x 10-3 / 100 x 10-9 = 5.31x10-5 = 0.0513mm
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top