Calculate Flow Rate Thru 3.175mm Nozzle Tip

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the flow rate through a 3.175 mm nozzle tip connected to a 19 mm delivery tube, supplied by air at 70 psi. Using Bernoulli's equation, the final velocity was determined to be 2997 in/s, leading to a calculated flow rate of 36.6 in³/s. The calculations assumed zero velocity in the tank and discharge to ambient pressure. Additionally, it was noted that for a more accurate flow rate, head loss due to the nozzle and pipe bends should be considered. The conversation highlights the complexities of using imperial units in fluid dynamics calculations.
jman123456789
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It's been a while since I've had to do these calculations..

I'm looking for the flow rate at the wall of a 3.175 mm nozzle tip. The diameter of the delivery leading up to it is 19 mm. This is a vertical assembly and the source of the air at 70 psi is a 1/4" outer diameter tube that is approximately 2.5" above the exit. There is about 120 cfh available maximum for this setup.

Anybody looking to take a shot at this, I'd be interested in seeing your solution..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can loosely solve this quickly by Bernoulli's equation. The equation can be written as:
<br /> \frac{p}{\rho} + \frac{V^2}{2} + gz = \mbox{constant}<br />

So, having what you know, we can solve for the final velocity, and then with the area, get the flow rate.
<br /> \frac{70 \frac{lbf}{in^2}}{0.43 \frac{lbm}{in^3}} + 0.0 + (386.4 \frac{in}{s^2})(30 in) = \frac{V^2}{2}<br />
Note here that I have assumed that the velocity in the tank is zero, and that the jet is discharging to ambient pressure (0 gauge). We multiply everything out for:
<br /> 162\frac{lbf\,in}{lbm} + 11592\frac{in^2}{s^2} = \frac{V^2}{2}<br />
Note the messed up term all the way on the left. That is the cause of much frustration using imperial units. In order to correlate a pound-mass with a pound-force, we need to use the gravitational constant. Now, note that everything here I'm using the inches-pounds-second (IPS) system. We add the gravitational constant:
<br /> \left(162\frac{lbf\,in}{lbm}\right)\left(386.4 \frac{lbm\,in}{lbf\,s^2}\right) + 11592\frac{in^2}{s^2} = \frac{V^2}{2}<br />
We now have in2/s2 on both terms. We multiply and add through for:
<br /> 8981481\frac{in^2}{s^2} = \frac{V^2}{2}<br />
Which results in a velocity of 2997 in/s. Calculate the area, which should be pretty easy. I found the flow rate to be 36.6 in3/s.

Now, for a more accurate calculation, you'll want to calculate the head loss due to the nozzle and pipe bends and add it as an extra term in the equation above.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top